Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: TIME FOR A SENATE INVESTIGATION! (Ray McGovern stirred the pot good)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:25 PM
Original message
NYT: TIME FOR A SENATE INVESTIGATION! (Ray McGovern stirred the pot good)
Edited on Sun May-07-06 10:39 AM by newyawker99
The Intelligence Business
Published: May 7, 2006


We've been waiting for well over two years for the Senate Intelligence Committee to finally hold the Bush administration accountable for the fairy tales it told about Saddam Hussein's weapons. Republican leaders keep saying it is a waste of time to find out whether President Bush and other top officials deliberately misled the world. But Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's bizarre responses the other day to questions about that very issue were a timely reminder of why this investigation needs to be completed promptly, thoroughly and fairly.

Unfortunately, Pat Roberts, the chairman of the Senate panel, is running it in a way that makes it unlikely that anything useful will come of it.

It is bad enough that Mr. Rumsfeld and others did not tell Americans the full truth — to take the best-case situation — before the war. But they are still doing it. Just look at the profoundly twisted version of events that the defense secretary offered last week at a public event in Atlanta.

Ray McGovern, an analyst for 27 years at the Central Intelligence Agency, stood in the audience and asked why Mr. Rumsfeld lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The secretary shot back, "I did not lie." Then, even though no one asked about them, he said Colin Powell and Mr. Bush offered "their honest opinion" based on "weeks and weeks" of time with the C.I.A. "I'm not in the intelligence business," he said, adding, "It appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there."

First, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Period. Second, neither Mr. Bush nor Mr. Powell spent long weeks with the C.I.A., whose analysts were largely cut out of the decision making. And that was because, third, Mr. Rumsfeld was, and is, very much in the intelligence business.


More at link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/opinion/07sun1.html?_r=1&hp


Amen. And....once again....thank you Ray!!


EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY 4 OR 5
PARAGRAPHS FROM THE COPYRIGHTED NEWS SOURCE
PER DU RULES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. another thank you ray
wonder if anyone will speak about this on the sunday shows or if it will just be about the cia replacement and spinning why there is need for the replacement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I think it's going to continue to smolder. Definitely Sunday talk...
will include it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you haven't seen the VIDEO go here:
Edited on Sat May-06-06 11:53 PM by Harper_is_Bush
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1102973

edit: be sure to check this KO Countdown vid at bradblog...it shows the full question by Ray McGovern:

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002783.htm

The first part that CNN leaves out is very interesting...the interruptions by the prick MC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. And hopefully it will meet full circle with the CIA Leak Investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. RumDum's bizarre responses--indeed!
Those bizarre responses, though, are indicative of what we hear from the entire illegal administration. The most bizarre thing yet is how there is ANYONE who is still willing to defend this admimistration.

Good on the NYT for not only picking up on the absurdity of RumDum's remarks and calling for a real investigation, but for pointing out that bush* has his stooges in Congress that makes all of this bizaro crap possible.

Don't let the pukes lay everything at the feet of bush*----None of this shit could have occurred without them!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for that piece. Ray McGovern may have opened
some eyes.




BTW, I noticed your AI avatar. We are forming a chapter here in town. We had one before but it folded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I knew everything he said, but he opened my eyes nonetheless....
Edited on Sun May-07-06 12:18 AM by Harper_is_Bush
I didn't realize a person could be so effective from the audience. He tossed a grenade in a firm yet calm and quiet way. Not a grenade though...more like a cluster bomb. It continues to inflict new damage long after it was dropped.

He managed to demonstrate Rumsfeld and the admin to be liars not once but twice in clear, concise terms which allowed the content to become the focus of the aftermath in the media.

I guess 27 years in the inelligence business makes a person pretty darn smart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. This is what speaking truth to power is all about.
You don't get into the spook business without being in the higher end of the intelligence scale. You have to score in the top ten percent to even be considered for military intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes. McGovern is obviously highly intelligent. He calmly tore Rummy a
new asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. What a feat because rummy is all asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. LOL!
What comes out of an assholes asshome, I wonder. Whatever Rummy says I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I was thinking of "an evil wind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Think of the lives that could have been saved
If the press had the balls to ask these questions before the war or at least as soon as we smelled the BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Even if the press had been asking the quesitons they still had to report
what Rummy and Cheney and Condi and Bush et al were saying.

It was an organized duping of the public. The media isn't used to and was ill-prepared for the methodical BS'ing they were faced with.

Even now, they need someone like McGovern to tell it to them like they're two years old.

Rummy being caught in a lie as he was should be much bigger news than it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Poor excuse
"The media isn't used to and was ill-prepared for the methodical BS'ing they were faced with."
It is nearly their sole purpose to watch for and report methodical BSings. They dropped the ball big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ray McGovern has generated an editorial call for a Senate Investigation.
With one question from the audience he has generated fresh calls for a Senate investigation to begin.

When is McGoverns fucking birthday coming up I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well....you can lead a horse to water.... last kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for posting this.
I always get surprised when the NYTimes has a good editorial. I understand from Senator Byrd that Senator Rockefeller, the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee, is recovering from back surgery and won't be back in the Senate until June. Anyway, I love it when the Times shames Senator Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. U R Welcome!
:toast:

It's hard for the mainstream media to ignore the simple logic of a 27 year CIA vet. Rummy was absolutely speechless both times McGovern demonstrated his lies.

The NYT is presenting the unaviodable conclusion from seeing something like that: time to start the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. von Rumsfeldt is a compulsive liar
It is a mainstay of his political philosophy to lie. There is no lie too big for the press and public to consume with relish. This is the essence of the current version of Straussian Machiavellianism which pervades the neo-con totalitarian cadre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. He got caught this time though!! Have you seen the VIDEO?
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002783.htm

"They gave the world their honest opinion," Rumsfeld added. "It appears that there were no weapons of mass destruction."

McGovern shot back,
"You said you knew where they were," referring to the Iraqi weapons.

"I did not," Rumsfeld retorted. "I said I knew where suspect sites were."

"You said you know where they were, near Tikrit, near Baghdad, and north, east, south and west of there. Those are your words," McGovern shot back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Oh, yes! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. one by one, B*shco will be hoisted on their own petard.
What's a petard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. A bomb
A petard was an early kind of bomb (1200s-1300s); you would launch it by trebuchet or roll it down a hill at the other guy. It was rarely terribly effective at actually killing anybody but usually caused quite a scare.

Sometimes, though, your engineer would have set the fuse too short or too fast, and it would go off while he was loading it on the trebuchet or positioning it to be pushed down the hill, and that engineer would be blown up into the air and "hoisted on his own petard".

It comes, incidentally, from the middle english word for "fart" because of the noise it made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Cool! Thanks.
I didn't know what a petard was either. DU makes you smart!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. why. thank you!
Now I understand what I said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes! Thank you Ray McGovern, but
Edited on Sun May-07-06 02:04 PM by indie_voter
to see the NYT calling the lies about Saddam "fairy tales" NOW makes my blood boil. Where were these people when Judy Miller was force feeding us said fairy tales?

The NYT also needs to be held accountable.

MHO

That said, to give the devil his due, very powerful and spot on editorial!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Can Pat Roberts be removed or demoted for obstruction?
Edited on Sun May-07-06 04:49 PM by Hubert Flottz
Edit...last time I checked Roberts didn't own the USA! And he DAMNED sure didn't pay OUR taxes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. He'll be removed in '06 when they lose the house, yes? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Pat Roberts is in the Senate. And yes, if we win
the Senate, Jay Rockefeller will be the Chairman and he will do quite a bit of investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC