Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold pursued an unusual line of questioning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:56 PM
Original message
Feingold pursued an unusual line of questioning
any video of Alito looking "uncomfortable?" Was it because of the oil on the seats?

http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/campaignforthecourt/2006/01/sen_feingold_1.html

<snip>

In the process, however, he pursued an unusual line of questioning that made Alito visibly uncomfortable. He asked Alito whether the subject of the eavesdropping and its legality came up during his rehearsals for the nomination.

After some hesitation, Alito, who was taken aback, said that the general area of wiretapping and foreign intelligence did come up.

Who was present during these practice sessions, asked Feingold.

"Nobody at these practice sessions has ever told me what to say," Alito stated, answering an unasked question, somewhat defensively.

Feingold said he only wants to know if Alito got any feedback on the subject or any suggestions from the administration on how to answer these questions.

"Not on the substance," said Alito.

Alito was then looking uncomfortable. "Nobody actually told me what the president was asserting. . . . I found the letter on the Internet, myself."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's our Russ!
:kick:

"In the process, however, he pursued an unusual line of questioning that made Alito visibly uncomfortable. He asked Alito whether the subject of the eavesdropping and its legality came up during his rehearsals for the nomination."

Feingold is asking the serious questions. Good to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. He, Kennedy and Schumer are kicking ass
I love it. Thank God for them right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. Right.
And I like the fact that feinstien picked up on his little caveat in his gratuitous answer earlier in the morning where he said: (rough quote) "court orders are generally required for wiretaps" I heard this and gasped... I was hoping someone would interrupt and call him on it right there... kudos difi on that catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
64. Giving all those who want to the ammunition to vote him down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
52. Did Feingold hint at questions about 'suspending Constitution' ?
A related thread delves into where the committee should be headed

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x104764

since in the Reagan administration he obviously 'signed off' on plans that would have let Ollie North and the gang unconstitutionally 'suspend' the constitution in order to round up and detain dissenters to any wars ginned up by the administration.

Seems Alito is merely a 'sockpuppet' for those who wish to destroy the Constitution rather than 'preserve, protect, and defend' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. drats, i had to work this afternoon and missed this. thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. love that man
he's a lawyer who loves the law and loves this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. So did they give him the URL of the letter on the Internet?
Who the f* is he kidding?!?!

And Russ: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. YESSSSSSSSSSSSS... Go Russ.
B-)

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks. I didn't get to hear Russ. This is good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is Important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I knew it I knew it I knew it
Alito appears to me to have a very tenuous grip on his temper and it looks like a tiny bit of deft probing by the Dems could provoke a memorable unjudicial tantrum right in front of god and everybody. I hope some of the other committee members took notice of his discomfort at this line of questioning and apply the needle a bit more at upcoming sessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. You know his temperature has been taken.
I can't wait for tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heaerd that snippet on KPFA today.
They are broadcasting ALL of the confirmation hearings.

http://www.kpfa.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Hey! Hey! KPFA! Whose Radio? Our Radio!
psst... Did you vote for the last listener elections LSB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I didn't vote. I did not have near the info to vote well
I have commented on that. I hope to vote in the next election. Realistically, I want my on air personalities to advocate.... they don't allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. i know... it's a very frustrating issue.. we should talk later about that.
pm me later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. I shall.... it is disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. President Feingold
...yep...rolls right off the tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yep! It sure the Hell does! Pres. Feingold: Leader of the Free World!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. And we also have to keep that little "Internet" comment of Alito's
front and center.

After all, Rightie Tightie pundits constantly claim that the Internet is bullshit, and only fanatics use it as a news source. So what does that make Alito? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
49. oh, is that so?
so me and many others are "fanatics"? what was the quote? i'm not able to catch the hearings live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
43. He's got my vote. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup great Russ!
Need to send him a note to follow this up with a question on whether Alito would support continuing to dismiss ALL cases involving security whistleblowers, etc. with the States Secret privilege without opinion. And explain why he would do so if he would follow what the court has been doing, or in what situations he would rule differently than the court has been! Russ would be the guy to ask this question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. I watched this with absolute pleasure and pride ...
almost felt like a naughty voyeur .... ;)

President Russ Feingold.... Leader of the Free World....

cleaning out the fascists thugs that hijacked America in 2000.

yes, I like the sound and THOUGHT of that... yes siree, i do. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. It's an idea that is growing on me for sure n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. what letter was he looking for on the internet

What a weird thing to say.

Beside the fact that "nobody TOLD him"---- translation,

They didn't TELL him, they gave him a piece of paper and he read what they wanted him to know.

Does he think we are CRAZY!

Yes he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
33. i caught that but i didn't know what the hell they were talking about..
anybody else know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. Looks like the Att. Gen. justification for NSA spying
Alito said he read the letter from the "assistant atttorney general" himself on the Internet. It looks like he was talking about a letter that Ass. Att. Gen. Moschella wrote to Congress that supposedly layed out the "legal justification" for the NSA spying program.

http://www.nationalreview.com/pdf/12%2022%2005%20NSA%20letter.pdf (it's a PDF file)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Feingold definitely "KNOWS" something.
I heard this part during the afternoon "work commute".
Feingold's questioning struck me as the kind of questions that a lawyer asks (already knows the answer).
Alito was tap dancing all over the place trying to evade a direct answer.
Something BIG is buried here, and Feingold has the shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I hope so
Tomorrow's questioning should be interesting. I'll have to try to go and watch that part. Sounds like he has something planned perhaps. I hope so! Maybe whatever it is can save us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Durbin's leading off, so he will set the tone.
I was intrigued by his reference to the mining disaster in opening statements. Let's see if that leads anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Maybe ol' Alito knows something about Ollie North and the 'suspension' of
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 11:44 PM by EVDebs
the Constitution that the Reagan era presidency/administration was setting up.

"" On July 5, 1987, Chardy reported over the KNT News Wire that
Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North helped draft a plan in 1984 to impose
martial law in the United States in event of an emergency.
According to Chardy, the secret plan called for suspension of the
Constitution, turning control of the government over to the
little-known Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), appointment
of military commanders to run state and local governments, and the
declaration of martial law in the event of such a crisis as nuclear
war, violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition to
a U.S. military invasion abroad.
North helped draft the plan to impose martial law while serving
as the NSC's laiason to FEMA. Chardy reported that an administration
official said the contingency plan was written as part of an executive
order or legislative package that Reagan would sign and hold within
NSC until such time as a severe crisis arose. "It is not known whether
Reagan signed the plan," Chardy added.
The plan was extraordinary enough to even frighten then-Attorney
General William French Smith into protesting to Robert McFarlane,
North's NSC boss at the time, that FEMA was establishing itself as an
"emergency czar" and "exceeding its proper function as a coordinating
agency for emergency preparedness."
This secret plan to declare martial law in the event of internal
dissent or national opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad took
on an added dimension as citizens gathered to protest the nation's
intervention in Honduras in March, 1988.""

http://www.skepticfiles.org/mys1/pc17.htm

Maybe while in the DOJ from 1981-1987 Samuel Alito came across something dealing with this 'suspension of the Constitution' stuff. It's a valid line of questioning, and I think Feingold has opened a vein on the Cheney crowd from back in the good ol' days. After all, given his background in the Reagan White House,

""From 1985-1987, Alito served in the Office of Legal Counsel as Deputy Assistant Attorney General where he provided constitutional advice for the Executive Branch"" from the Bush White House's official website
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/judicialnominees/alito.html ,

the question is begging to be answered..."what was your role in the approval of Ollie North's plans to suspend the Constitution, and how would you characterize such an action as 'Constitutional', Mr. Alito ?"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. Interesting... Have you sent it to his office yet?
Call his staff? No Wait... Fax it to him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
41. Shit! Alito was part of the goddam Secret Government in the Reagan WH!
fuck, i didn't get it!! Now I do! jeese, I'm being dense.

Feingold has got to be all over this like flies on shit i hope.

Jesus - We have the JFK assinators combined with the Iran Contra fucks, combined with the Niguagara Death Squad hit man, combined with the Secret Government cabal - EVERY FUCKER ALIVE ARE THERE just about is there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #41
53. The wordplay involved with these guys and media is great too
Specter's "magic bullet" on observation is also known as the "pristine bullet". NO bullet going through that much flesh and bone could come out looking like it supposedly does today. Therefore...what's it doing in the record of 'evidence' ? www.assassinationscience.com has great info on the Zapruder film and autopsy photos showing that one or the other (or both) had been doctored.

Iran Contra lunacy speaks for itself too. Missiles to Iran and military hardware also to Iraq. This is classic 'Third Option' b.s. from Ted Shackley FYI.

Everything's on a 'need to know' basis, even what goes to the Supreme Court now I suppose.

Looneytunes, absolutely looneytunes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. Well, I betcha Hitchens sent this to Feingold already and probably more..
Since he wrote about it...

so, maybe this is what Feingold was on to... I hope round 3 exposes more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. My feeling too.
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 11:56 PM by ClayZ
Feingold has something. He was brilliant today. It was a thing of beauty to watch!

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011006Q.shtml

Alito and His Coaches


For Supreme Court nominee, hearings are an inside game.

Washington, DC - In the first hours of Samuel Alito's Senate confirmation hearings on Monday, Judiciary Committee member Lindsey Graham, the Republican senator from South Carolina, may very well have irreparably compromised himself.

At the hearing, Graham told Alito, nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, that he had already decided in Alito's favor. "I don't know what kind of vote you're going to get, but you'll make it through. It's possible you could talk me out of voting for you, but I doubt it. So I won't even try to challenge you along those lines."

snip>
The coaching session for Alito has raised a few eyebrows.
snip>




:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Looks like Graham put his foot in his mouth
Looks like he could have put his foot in his mouth and can screw things up. Boy I don't want to be him when that happens and Bush finds out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. yep... I agree. this is what i think...
first, i need to say that i got to watch Feingold and i highly recommend that this is watched in a repeat broadcast or go on line to C-Span.

two important points came to my mind -

first that I think you're right. Feingold KNOWS something that very nearly got revealed in the press vis a vis Rosenbaum, the journalist who just got offed after reporting on some sort of skull duggery type of connections between Alito, Abramoff AND elections fraud (if memory serves - posted at Raw Story this past Sunday or Monday)..

So I agree with you, I think it is major.

the other thing i suspect Feingold was doing, was setting the table for conflict of interest issues regarding Vangaurd and other investments, where Alito should have recused himself - i think Feingold is going to nail him in round 2. (i hope)

If there is something that Feingold knows that's really hot, i hope that enough evidence falls together to keep Alito from being confirmed.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
51. HE KNOWS LINDSEY GRAHAM WAS ONE OF THE TUTORS!!
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 03:11 AM by flyarm
a certain conflict of interest to be one of his tutors when he is sitting on judgement of the very man he will vote on!!
it actually is probably an ethics violation!!!!!!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
59. Alito knows something too
He was so incredibly nervous & evasive. His voice kept rising like people do when they're lying or afraid - I could swear he was afraid of Feingold. Alito knows something, and he's worried Feingold knows too. You could also tell how he answered the questions - very defensive & answering questions that weren't asked. He's not a very good lyer.

This little tap dance bothered me the most -

FEINGOLD: OK. Who was present at these practice sessions where these questions were discussed? And who gave you feedback or suggestions or made any comment whatsoever on the answers you gave?
ALITO: Nobody at these sessions or at any of the sessions that I had has ever told me what to say in response to any question.
FEINGOLD: I just asked -- were there no comments...

So WHO WAS THERE during these practice sessions? Alito neatly sidestepped that question & focused instead on what they said - distracting Fiengold from his first question. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush himself was visiting - he personally visited the NY Times editors about the NSA story; it'd make sense that he'd visit his SC nominee as well to make sure he's "on board".

Washington Post has full transcripts for anyone who couldn't watch it -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001087.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
il_lilac Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. also fishy is who helped coach him
Is'nt Lindsey Graham in a conflict of interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. You think it was Graham? hmmm interesting..
I was thinking it was white house legal staff, but ya know.. i think you're on to something.

i don't know if it's a conflict of interest but i do think it's interesting that Feingold felt compelled to try and call him out on it, and also to spank those assholes on the committee for their bullshit whining, all on live tv!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
39. Someone on Malloy is talking about this now!
He is talking about how Feingold asked Alito about the coaching and of course Alito denied it and claimed he had never been through these type of hearings before and wasn't familiar with the routine. He has never been through it but he has to go through these type of hearings to become the judge he is now. So he lied under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. this is very important, I wonder if Feingold stumbled onto something or
does he "actually" know/smell something. I would love to be at his office for the discussions on this. He has been saying impeachment as much as Conyers lately. :popcorn:

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
70. Delete
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 05:26 PM by happydreams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Nobody at these practice sessions has ever told me what to say,"
When he wasn't EVEN ASKED THE QUESTION.

That alone is ENOUGH FOR A FILIBUSTER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
34. Alito appeared uncomfortable AND evasive
What is he hiding? From his answers, it seems obvious that someone in the administration prepped him with the "right" answers to the questions of illegal wiretaps, presidential power, and the war on terror.

It's highly unethical at best, and shows that Alito puts political ideology over the rule of law and the constitution. That should automatically preclude him from a position on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Alito was thrown off guard, stammered and stuttered and yes very evasive
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. I got the feeling
that he was trying to find a way to answer the question without lying - he is under oath. Other Dems need to hammer home this point until he either tells the whole truth, or until they catch him in a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. oh honey, it's a lot more serious than what we saw on tv today...
read up thread..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. Mehlman was one of the preppers
He mentioned it on tv yesterday. I noticed him sitting behind, and to the right on the screen, of Alito. You gotta know they went over the FISA and wire tap issue. At one point when the questioning got dicy, and I believe it was during this time that Mehlman coughed a couple of times. Hummm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eve_was_framed Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
44. I saw the exchange and I was totally riveted with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
48. Good stuff... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
50. Feingold's last sentences on his last round
should be, "you were tutored, prepped, coached and rehearsed on the questions that were likely to come before you on this committee. Do you think we should place a judge on the Supreme Court for a lifetime appointment who needs to have coaching sessions before his confirmation hearing? I would like a yes or no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
54. Hey, Cocoa! You made the Daou Report on salon.com!
http://daoureport.salon.com/

Look at the left column under "On the Radar"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
55. Feingold continues to exceed all expectations for politicians. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. I noted how Alito evaded the question about who was there.
Very interesting.

I still think the fascist will be on the SC, unfortunately, but I'm glad for the Senators who are at least holding his feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. This was the very end of the exchange, according to the transcript.
FEINGOLD: Does it strike you as being inappropriate for members of the Department of Justice or the White House staff who are currently defending the president's actions in the NSA domestic spying program to be giving you advice on how you might handle questions about that topic in the hearing?

ALITO: It would be very inappropriate for them to tell me what I should say. And I wouldn't have been receptive to that sort of advice. And I did not receive that kind of advice.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/10/politics/politicsspecial1/text-day2.html?pagewanted=print


In other words, Alito seems to be saying that yes he was murderboarded by DoJ and NSA staff. We have to take his word for it that they didn't give him advice, whatever that means. Maybe they just happened to be passing by the room when the murderboard was being given and they were down a couple of stand-ins. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. They just gave him advice about "style"
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 12:29 PM by Marie26
not "substance." You know, what tie to wear, remembering to smile, etc. The NSA & DOJ lawyers are sort of like the Miss Manners of the government & just teach nominees about the rules of etiquette. Didn't you know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Sure, that makes perfect sense.
Look at what they did for Condi! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
60. Alito is extremely evasive in his responses.
I've never heard anyone respond to direct questions quite in the manner he does. There is a lot of fancy footwork, a lot of dog and pony show, but nothing forthright and straightforward about him whatsoever.

I've only watched him on liveoaktx's videos, but he makes me want to jump up and shout, "Just answer the damn question that was asked, not the question you want to answer!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. He's a weasel.
I've watched most all of the hearing thus far and as it progresses, he's convincing me we will be in serious trouble if he's confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. He is a weasel
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 01:00 PM by Marie26
This isn't a factual analysis or anything, but he is a weasel. I almost couldn't take watching him as he weaseled out of one question after another. I didn't like his voice, his messed-up tie, his attitude. There was something kind of creepy about him. He also didn't seem all that bright. Roberts was conservative, but at least he was direct & self-assured in his answers. You got the sense he was his own man. With Alito, I get the sense he is a toady for somebody else. And he's definitely trying to hide something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I agree with you, and
this isn't factual analysis either, but did you happen to observe Mrs. Alito's body language yesterday? I noticed it last night while watching a replay on CSPAN. Any time a Dem questioned Sammy boy, she averted her gaze off to the right or left and sat expressionless, sometimes even frowning. But when a Repug questioned him, she looked directly at the questioner and became quite animated, smiling etc.

Very telling, IMHO, as to what kind of person both of them are. He's GOP yes man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Yes, she annoyed me too
Wow, I guess I'm easily annoyed, huh? She was very obvious in her body language & expressions as to which Senators she agreed with. I think that's probably part of the reason she's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Delete
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 05:30 PM by happydreams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
68. What a find. What a find.
Good job, Cocoa! Very, very interesting line of questioning.

"I found the letter on the Internet, myself."

But who told him where to look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
69. RUSS RUSS RUSS!
Thanks cocoa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
71. Go Russ, Alito gives me the creeps. How did this guy grow up in the 60s?
..and the seventies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. he was that really out-of-sorts kid
that never partied, got his jollies watching those brothers corner the silver market, kept his hair short and wondered if he'd EVER get laid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
72. Feingold doesn't need to "know" specifics.
If he knows anything about these fascists he can assume they will have trouble with this and that they have been winking and nodding at each other.

I suggested this line of inquiry yesterday at this topic:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
75. go Russ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC