|
are very often resented. There's a feeling that they don't respect the people that have been running things - that all their work is devalued - if they don't come in and just observe and learn - for a fairly long time. This is especially the case if they go from loose management to something they perceive as micromanagement. They've been forced to give up some of their power - and anyone in this forum knows how people respond to that!
This is a conflict - obviously - if the people who have been running things have also been breaking safety guidelines, cause that has to be fixed. But maybe a better management approach would be to think about how to get the parents to buy into that. Instead of dictating from up above how it's gonna be fixed, it might have been more diplomatic to do it in a way that forces compliance with rules, but doesn't take away the PTA's power.
What I'm thinking - and feel free to share this with her, if you feel you can, and if the changes are still going on - is to ask for a committee of parents that can review the guidelines, and self-assess which ones are being violated, and come up with solutions. As a manager, that says "This is what I need done, I respect your ability to operate independently and fix it" instead of "crap, you guys are a bunch of screw-ups, thank god someone competent is in charge of you now."
Girls are socialized from a very small age to play and communicate in cooperative ways (playing imagination games, playing house), where nobody is the boss. When we get into management positions, we're then socialized to act like dominant males - take charge, don't be afraid to give orders.
I have two thoughts on that. The first is that the women (or at least one/some of them) might be having a bristly reaction to having to deal with a "gender-traitor" - not that that's justified, I'm just saying. The second thought, though, is that as a society, we put less value on how girls communicate and cooperate - and I'm not sure we ought to.
|