Army personnel violated Pentagon directive

[Joey Liberal]

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/09/27/military_army_personnel_violated_pentagon_directive_by_attending_mccain_event/

Military: Army personnel violated Pentagon directive by attending McCain event

Republican presidential hopeful John McCain posed for a photo with Sergeant 1st Class Chad Kozdra at a "No Surrender" rally held at the Londonderry American Legion Post 27 in Londonderry, N.H. Sept. 14. (AP Photo)

By Sasha Issenberg, Globe Staff | September 27, 2007

MANCHESTER, N.H. --Seven on-duty Army personnel participated in a campaign event for Senator John McCain earlier this month in Londonderry, New Hampshire, in an apparent violation of a Pentagon directive against partisan political activity, two military officials confirmed this week.

The September 14 rally at an American Legion hall was part of McCain's "No Surrender" tour of early-primary states, a martial pageant designed to draw attention to the Arizona Republican's continued support for the war in Iraq. Seven personnel from a Manchester, New Hampshire, recruiting station appeared in uniform and briefly addressed the crowd.
A Department of Defense directive signed in August 2004 by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz prohibits on-duty members of the armed forces from "speak before a partisan political gathering, including any gathering that promotes a partisan political party, candidate, or cause."

In addition, on-duty military personnel are forbidden from attending any political event in uniform except the national party conventions.

After introducing other dignitaries and before giving his defense of General David Petraeus and the Bush administration's strategy in Iraq, McCain handed a microphone to each of the seven soldiers — all wearing fatigues and berets — who introduced themselves by name, rank, and, in some cases, a description of their prior service elsewhere.

The Army personnel then stood alongside McCain in front of approximately 75 attendees. The campaign had advertised the midday event as a "barbecue," and served hot dogs, hamburgers, chips and soda.

"Thanks guys for being here," McCain said. We're honored by your presence and your service."

A Pentagon official did not dispute that the 2004 directive would apply in this instance.

"Department of Defense maintains a long-standing policy that DoD personnel acting in their official capacity may not be engaged in activities that associate DoD with any partisan political campaign or election, candidate, cause or issue," Lt. Col. Jonathan Withington wrote in a statement.

In a brief interview after the event, Seargeant First Class Chad Kozdra, the commanding officer at the recruiting station, said he had been approached days earlier about participating in the event by the McCain campaign. He said he supported McCain and had also done so in 2000.

"What they were told is that this was a support-the-troops barbeque," not a campaign appearance, said Paul Boyce, a U.S. Army public-affairs officer.

In April, an individual identifying himself as Kozdra wrote in a posting on the Myspace web site, "I believe that John McCain would make a good President not for his past military history but for his record in Congress."

"They weren't there to support a political campaign," said McCain spokeswoman Crystal Benton. "We don't believe anyone intended an infraction of DoD policy. Nor do we believe soldiers should be prevented from showing their support for fellow soldiers."

But a leading specialist in military law said they believed it was a clear violation.

"It was obviously a political event," said Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice. "Military personnel should not be participating."

During a campaign season taking place amid a contentious national debate over a controversial war, there have been other high-profile cases of those in uniform drawing attention for their political activities. In June, a Marine reservist received what an official described at the time as a "nonpunitive discharge" for participating in an antiwar demonstration.

Boyce said the Army has taken no disciplinary action against the seven personnel who appeared at McCain's event in Londonderry.

© Copyright 2007 Globe Newspaper Company.

[Joey Liberal]

1. Here is the number to call

Here is the number to the Public Affairs Chief of the New England Recruiting Battalion: 207-725-8634

[Joey Liberal]

2. Here is the e-mail address

http://www.usarec.army.mil/1stbde/1dbn/Command/commandp...

[Joey Liberal]

3. Here is the e-mail for the Recuiting Commander

[email protected]

[Joey Liberal]

4. My e-mail to the recruiting commander

Dear LTC Murdock,
As a taxpayer and an Army veteran, I feel that your Soldiers have let all taxpayers and citizens down by taking part in a campaign event for Sen. McCain. In doing so while in uniform, they gave the false impression that the U.S. Army endorses Sen. McCain. We do not pay taxes for your troops to be appearing with a Presidential candidate, regardless of party affiliation. If this is the sort of command that you run, perhaps you should step aside for the good of the country. I've got some news for you, LTC Murdock; not everyone in this country is a republican. So please stop using your Soldiers for political events. I think you, as their commander, owe the country an apology.

[rakeeb]

5. nice email....

but I would have dropped the part where you remind him that not everyone in this country is a republican; it kind of implies that you wouldn't have bothered to email him if it wasn't a republican candidate. It also implies that you assume he is a republican.

Instead of suggesting that it was his idea to send them, (and according to the story SFC Kozdra was the one approached by McCain's people days before the event, and dealt with them before), I would have pointed out the fact that since recruiting battalions are so dispersed and decentralized, (LTC Murdock works at 33 Canam Drive, Topsham, ME and SFC Kozda works in a store front in a K-Mart strip mall in Manchester, NH), the BC (Bn Commander) hasn't done a very good job of making his command philosophy known to those junoir leaders out there 120 miles away from the flag pole.
That would get under his skin, since he already knows he has his work cut out for him with E-6's and E-7's in charge of stations with no daily officer supervision all over New England from Bangor to Providence.

BTW, all these locations are available on that link you provided and about two seconds on google.

SFC Kozda's CO, CPT Whoever, probably works here, the only one without an email address but everyone loves to get a fax!

New Hampshire Recruiting Company 1D2
4 Tinkham Avenue
Derry, NH 03038
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

[Joey Liberal]

6. Good points - Thanks

but I would have dropped the part where you remind him that not everyone in this country is a republican; it kind of implies that you wouldn't have bothered to email him if it wasn't a republican candidate. It also implies that you assume he is a republican.

Instead of suggesting that it was his idea to send them, (and according to the story SFC Kozdra was the one approached by McCain's people days before the event, and dealt with them before), I would have pointed out the fact that since recruiting battalions are so dispersed and decentralized, (LTC Murdock works at 33 Canam Drive, Topsham, ME and SFC Kozda works in a store front in a K-Mart strip mall in Manchester, NH), the BC (Bn Commander) hasn't done a very good job of making his command philosophy known to those junoir leaders out there 120 miles away from the flag pole.
That would get under his skin, since he already knows he has his work cut out for him with E-6's and E-7's in charge of stations with no daily officer supervision all over New England from Bangor to Providence.

-----------
I added the part about not everyone being republican while I was still fired up after reading the Boston Globe article. I thought about deleting that part, but my emotions were in charge at that moment. Still, I felt that the Battalion Commander needed to feel some heat over this, and after all, he is probably a republican anyway, as Democrat active duty officers are kind of rare in the Army. I know one (he tipped me off to this story) and he is a great guy. Thanks for the additional info!

[Joey Liberal]

7. And welcome to DU rakeeb!

Looking forward to reading more of your posts! Welcome aboard!

[rakeeb]

8. thanks

and just a quick reminder, the military was about 60% republican before the war started, and the numbers have shifted left a bit since, but it sounds about right, without reading the data I would have surmised that about 40% of the officers I have known since 1993 were registered democrat.