Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marine sues Murtha for Hadithah comments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:07 AM
Original message
Marine sues Murtha for Hadithah comments


Justin Sharratt
Exonerated former Marine files slander suit



Marine sues Murtha for Hadithah comments
By Ramesh Santanam - The Associated Press
Posted : Friday Sep 26, 2008 7:47:40 EDT

PITTSBURGH — A former Marine lance corporal sued Rep. John Murtha for slander Thursday, saying the Pennsylvania Democrat damaged his reputation by saying Marines killed women and children “in cold blood” in Hadithah, Iraq, in November 2005.

The federal lawsuit claims Murtha violated Justin Sharratt’s rights to due process and presumption of innocence with comments on various news shows in May 2006. Sharratt, who was honorably discharged last year, said he received hate e-mails and has been called “baby killer” when he has gone out in Canonsburg, about 15 miles south of Pittsburgh.

“Sharratt, in being labeled repeatedly by Murtha as a ‘cold-blooded murderer,’ and by Murtha outrageously claiming that the Hadithah incident was comparable to the infamous (My Lai) massacre of Vietnam, has suffered permanent, irreversible damage to his reputation,” the lawsuit states. American service members killed as many as 504 Vietnamese villagers in the My Lai massacre.

Military prosecutors have said 24 Iraqis, including women and children, were killed in Hadithah on Nov. 19, 2005, after one Marine was killed and two others wounded by a roadside bomb. Murtha, a former Marine and decorated Vietnam War veteran, blamed the killings on troops under too much pressure in Iraq.

Sharratt, 24, was initially charged with three counts of premeditated murder but was exonerated after a full investigation and the military equivalent of a preliminary hearing. Sharratt said it was proved he killed insurgents, not civilians.


Rest of article at: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2008/09/ap_murtha_hadithah_suit_092508/%2e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think he will find a civilian court a little different than a prelim in the military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In what way?
Without any facts from the investigation in his hands, John made the decision that these Marines were guilty.

Facts not in evidence and statements that injure your reputation = slander and libel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Someone killed them
"Military prosecutors have said 24 Iraqis, including women and children, were killed in Hadithah on Nov. 19, 2005"

I don't think Murtha called this guy out individually. But, if he wants to make it about himself so be it. And I'm sorry but I have a hard time buying that this guy is being called "baby killer" while he tools around Canonsburg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I haven't seen any quote from Murtha referring to this guy by name ...
and yet, Repukes use all kinds of vicious smears BY name on Dems, and Dems can't sue???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You've Talked To Murtha
An investigation that might very well have been all "wink, wink, nudge, nudge, you know what I mean" from the very beginning.

At this point in time we don't know what evidence Murtha might or might not have, we'll just have to wait and see.

"At a news conference Thursday, Sharratt and his attorney, Noah Geary, denied any civilians were killed on purpose, and Sharratt said he didn’t witness any civilian deaths."


That makes it all better, because no civilians were killed on purpose, and he didn't witness any civilian deaths? Come on?

I guess the bodies of women and children weren't much of a hint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Never called him out by name and the investigation by the miltiary
had already begun and enough info had been gathered before Murtha stated anything. And his statements were in no way slander. He stated the obviouse, innocents were killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC