Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great book for the Woo in your life -

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 12:53 PM
Original message
Great book for the Woo in your life -
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 12:54 PM by mr blur
Suckers - How alternative Medicine Makes Fools of Us All

by Rose Shapiro.



"... a calling to account of a massive social and intellectual fraud; an entertaining and utterly essential guide to a dangerous global delusion."

The prefect gift for that person you know of whom you're really fond but who believes that waving crystals around can cure cancer and still a great read for those of us who, sadly, maybe won't be too shocked by the content.

Review: http://newhumanist.org.uk/1744
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately the real woos...
will just say that the author is in the pay of Big Pharma.

Some of them are just like religious fundies, with Big Pharma substituted for the Devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The true believers are unreachable
Their the ones who verbally attacked Carl Sagan when he was alive using the well-worn ad hom that he was abrasive, derogatory and closed-minded. Can you believe that? Calling Carl Sagan any of those things? The man bent over backwards to be kind and understanding of extraordinary beliefs and yet he was still attacked. Then later, after his death, there was an effort by some to co-opt Sagan and say that he privately adopted many wooish beliefs but wouldn't come out publicly for fear of what people like Randi et. al. would say about him in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ah "the death bed confessional" type of thing?
You know how everytime an atheist dies there is some sort of story about "finding God" at the end?:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not exactly deathbed, but close
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 10:53 AM by salvorhardin
There's a number of claims about Sagan having wooish beliefs. Richard "face on Mars" Hoagland is famous for taking Sagan out of context or trying to co-opt Sagan's authority.

Then, near the end of his life, Sagan underwent his final public change on the subject of Cydonia: in a 180-degree turn from the PARADE article, he went out of his way to separate the "Cydonia investigation" from the other, "pseudo-science" targets of his last published work, "The Demon Haunted World." In this final written statement of his life, Carl Sagan deftly contradicted all his previous "official" positions on Cydonia: pointing out that the Cydonia investigation, as distinguished from most "extraordinary claims," stood apart -- by having the one essential precept of "good science" … it could actually be tested. He concluded his "about face" by arguing that, as a clear "scientific problem," Cydonia deserved to be fairly tested in the coming years … via a veritable fleet of new missions then heading back to Mars …

Which, curiously, is precisely when NASA (and Russian) missions to the Red Planet literally began to disappear …
http://www.enterprisemission.com/MTM.htm


Journalist Joel Achenbach, in Captured by Aliens (1999), noted that once Sagan achieved superstardom with Cosmos, he became the public lightning rod for both the science and the pseudoscience of extraterrestrial life. As the “keeper of the gates” who effectively defined the border between science and pseudoscience, he was actively courted by many fringe figures who sought in his blessing a legitimization of their interests or beliefs. As an example, Achenbach reported this interview with Richard Hoagland, the popularizer of the “Face on Mars.” Hoagland explained that in a public meeting in 1985, Sagan commented that those planning NASA missions to Mars should be open to discovering the unexpected. According to Hoagland, when Sagan made these remarks, he briefly made direct eye-contact with Hoagland, who was in the audience. In the weird world of pseudoscience, Sagan’s innocent comment was interpreted as a coded message encouraging Hoagland to pursue his advocacy of an artificial origin for the Face—which he continues to this day, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. (See some of Sagan’s thoughts on the Hoagland/Mars Face matter in “Carl Sagan Takes Questions: More from his ‘Wonder and Skepticism’ CSICOP 1994 Keynote,” SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, July/August 2005.)

Sagan’s role is especially interesting because he himself was accused of straying beyond the limits of proper science in his pursuit of evidence for life on other planets and his defense of SETI. As Achenbach argues, it was precisely because of his apparent open-minded attitude toward fringe topics that many on the fringe became so bitter when Sagan turned against them.
http://www.csicop.org/si/2007-01/sagan.html


There's also a spiritualist type who purports that Sagan was a believer in his own special brand of mysticism and psychic powers for a good portion of his life. Can't find that reference right now though. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Same with Einstein
A woo post with an Einstein quote pops up just about every day on DU.

My favorite is the story that when Einstein died, he was reading Velikovsky's Worlds In Collision. If that one is true, at least we can be sure Einstein died laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC