Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guaranteed Minimum Income thread needs help from poverty advocates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Poverty Donate to DU
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:09 PM
Original message
Guaranteed Minimum Income thread needs help from poverty advocates
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6166410

Experience has shown that many DUers would like to continue ignoring the one and only immediate and permanent solution to poverty.

Let's not make it easy for them. Regular kicks would help keep this idea at the forefront.

Poverty will absolutely not be solved until a GMI is implemented, and we can't afford to take no for answer. It all starts with educating and convincing the home crowd. We have to do that before the idea will ever have a chance elsewhere.
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was in a store recently and over heard a young woman telling the cashier
that the hamburger - fast food establishment was reducing their wages from the minimum wage to $2.15 an hour. This spo shocked me that when I got home I searched the net to see if this is legal. I found that it is. The minimum wage set for employees that earn money from tips has not been raised since I think 1970. And since many people who eat at fast food places are young teenagers, I think the tips will be either very small or not at all. Sad for the people who will work at that place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teachableseconds Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Whoa...wait a minute here:
If this is a sit-down place with wait staff, then yeah. But you mentioned fast food. They have minimum wages and actually raised them higher a few years ago (before the bottom fell out) because they were having trouble attracting people. There is no way that a Bugger King would ever have two bucks an hour as a wage. The workers don't get tips. They have started putting out a cup for possible tips at some places, but that is not the same as someone getting waited on and tipping. And there are some burger places that would fit that bill. I have never been a waitress, but if you can get 4 tables an hour, you can make a decent wage for someone without a degree, I am thinking...

My question is what we would designate as 'living wage?' I am thinking around $12-14 an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Simeon Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. How will it work?
Naturyl,

Great! Now how do we get a GMI to work? Seriously, if we are going to "educate the home crowd" there must be a means of not only implementing the program but supporting (funding) it as well. How do we define who is eligible? - or is everyone eligible?

Simeon
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are two major proposals.
One is "Basic Income Grants" which would go to everyone. All citizens would get a monthly check sufficient to raise any recipient out of poverty. Those who didn't need the money would repay it through normal taxation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income

The other, and the one I favor, is a "Negative Income Tax." This gives everyone below the poverty line a refundable tax credit sufficient to raise their income above the poverty line.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_income_tax

There is plenty of information at the Wikipedia links provided, as well as the external links and references in each article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Thank you for the links. Nixon, our last liberal president, advocated this!
How long will it take?

More accurately, how many unnecessary deaths before this necesary change is made???
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I prefer a basic income law.
It's a lot more stable than a lump sum for a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whoever unreced this into less than zero
Edited on Mon Jul-27-09 11:32 PM by Naturyl
Is a coward and not a friend of the poor. Isn't anonymity great? Your inner Freeper can run wild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yet, we've been assured that DUers are using the "unrec" "responsibly".
I've seen this many times now on poverty issues, and I think this needs to be documented and protested.

Or, alternatively, ADMIT that it's not "progressive" and/or Democratic to care about poverty, and make that statement up front.

Thank you for pointing this out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. An ancient idea...
Edited on Mon Jul-27-09 11:41 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...we were debating this in high school in 1973-4: "Resolved:That the federal government should guarantee a minimum annual income to each family unit." I have an old copy of The Report of the President's Commission on Income Maintenance Systems somewhere in the attic.

(NB 'The President' was that damn socialist, Nixon.)

The EITC was a direct outgrowth of that effort 35 years ago.

I remember the first line of the 1AC: "The leading cause of poverty in the United States is not having enough money."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, it's not a new idea by any means.
Nixon nearly passed it. Milton Friedman (of all people) supported it. There was a time when this was actually on the table as an actual possibility.

But that time is long-past, and it's up to us to bring it back. America needed this 35 years ago and still needs it today. The EITC, implemented by Reagan (again, of all people) is nice, but nowhere near sufficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Simeon Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. No kiddin' ? ! ?


How many degrees did the person who wrote that have?

So are we going to fix the problem by giving it away or by creating an economy with more opportunity?
(Giving it away is not going to work. It never has and never will. )

Simeon
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Opportunity" is not relevant to all people in poverty.
Never has been and never will.

Expanding "opportunity" is a partial solution at best, and it leaves a large number behind. A GMI leaves no one behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Can't recommend because it's been too long, but this is a great idea.
I had no idea it was started by Nixon. I'd never heard of it. How do we get this going viral?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OpieTaylor Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Not a chance
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 05:24 AM by OpieTaylor
I'm 32 y/o, and I support a 6y/o daughter, her 25y/o mother, and my 70y/o mother on $8.50hr. I live below the "poverty" line. I have a home, car, internet, cable t.v., a cell phone, electricity, heat, food, water, and clothing. What a great country we live in when even the poor can enjoy some luxuries. Just because you're jealous doesn't mean you don't make enough money.Don't be mad because your neighbor drives a brand new mercedes, and you only have a 10y/o chevy. My grandfather used to tell me "Son, it's not how much money you make that matters, it's what you do with it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Why is a Repuke sullying Opie's name?
You took a wrong turn. Please return to the cave you crawled out of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uppityperson. Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hi there Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. What should it be, though? We have to decide on a living wage. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Europe HAS a min income
At least some areas

Eg. Holland IIRC

Tiny amt of cash tho.

PS Nixon not origin of idea.

Many such ideas shd have been made real by 1933, if not 5 million BC when humans began.

End human suffering is THE goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Poverty Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC