Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slim and beautiful galaxies, too good to be true.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 05:38 AM
Original message
Slim and beautiful galaxies, too good to be true.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0CDEQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ps.uci.edu%2F~jlf%2Fresearch%2Fpress%2Fdm_1106newscientist.pdf&rct=j&q=slim%20perfect%20galaxies&ei=Y54NTtS-O-n40gGPhtm6Dg&usg=AFQjCNHb89wiLvumabXnMRvUbF83YZ5pSg&cad=rja

Then, in 2004, Kormendy teamed up with Ralf Bender of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Munich, Germany. Their groups started to examine detailed images of large nearby spiral galaxies taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, backing them up with spectral observations from the University of Texas's Hobby-Eberly Telescope. The results, published in November last year, were something of a shock. Of 19 large nearby spirals, at least 11 seemed to have no bulge, indicating that violent mergers didn't feature in their past. Among them were the seemingly exemplary Pinwheel galaxy - and the Milky Way (The Astrophysical Journal, vol 723, p 54).

What these galaxies do have is a bright central concentration of stars all crowded together. To a casual observer it looks like a bulge, but the orderly trajectory of the stars, plus areas of active star formation characteristic of quietly rotating discs, indicate that these stellar swarms do not in fact protrude from the galaxy's plane. It is a nicety that is easy to overlook if we don't have the luck of seeing a galaxy edge-on. "For many decades, they were misidentified as classical bulges," says Kormendy.

And this huge number of slimline, pristine spirals has morphed into a big problem for the hierarchical picture. To get as large as they are, they must have merged, yet "we don't know how to prevent bulge formation when galaxies grow big via mergers", says Kormendy. Jim Peebles, a cosmologist at Princeton University, agrees. "It is wildly unexpected in the standard model," he says.

It's not the only odd thing about these galaxies, either. Twenty years ago, Kormendy was among the first to propose that supermassive black holes play a significant part in galaxy evolution. We think that these black holes exist at the heart of most galaxies because matter near their cores seems to be whirling around a vastly dense agglomeration of mass. In the 1990s, Kormendy and others noted that bigger bulges tend to go hand-in-hand with bigger black holes, suggesting that the two develop in tandem.

Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC