Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Star Trek's warp drive: Not impossible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:32 PM
Original message
Star Trek's warp drive: Not impossible
The idea is that you take a chunk of space-time and move it," said Marc Millis, former head of NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project. "The vehicle inside that bubble thinks that it's not moving at all. It's the space-time that's moving."

Already happened?
One reason this idea seems credible is that scientists think it may already have happened. Some models suggest that space-time expanded at a rate faster than light speed during a period of rapid inflation shortly after the Big Bang. "If it could do it for the Big Bang, why not for our space drives?" Millis said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30600749/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very cool. I remember a TNG episode where warp drives were found to
damage subspace. Would be weird if that was also found to be possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bust several static warp bubles might be able to fix it.


STNG: All good things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. "It's the space-time that's moving" sounds like gibberish. Moving through what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The continuum, of course.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. well if its gibberish
then we have problems because inflation theory is what currently explains, well, a whole lot of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Itself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Inflationary theory is some trippy shit, to say the least.
Somebody (I think it was Alan Guth) speculated that the size of the observable universe relative to the size of the universe in its entirety, might be akin to the size difference between a quarter (as in a 25-cent piece) and the entire Earth! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC