Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doctor may be sued for criticism of breast enhancement cream

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 01:13 AM
Original message
Doctor may be sued for criticism of breast enhancement cream
By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
Thursday, 11 November 2010

A doctor has been threatened with a libel action after claiming that a £125 breast enhancement cream did not work.

Dalia Nield, a consultant plastic surgeon at the private London Clinic, was quoted in a newspaper saying it was "highly unlikely" that the cream would increase a woman's breast size.

The manufacturer, Rodial Ltd, claimed that the cream could increase a bust by 2.5cm without the need for surgery. It recommended that women rub it into their chests every day for 56 days. Celebrity users are reported to include Scarlett Johansson, Victoria Beckham and Kelly Brook.

Ms Nield, who has 19 years of experience, said the manufacturers had not given information on the exact ingredients in the product, how they increased the size of the breast or what tests they had carried out. She added that it might even harm the skin and the breasts, rendering it "potentially dangerous".

Rodial Ltd has threatened Ms Nield with a libel action for questioning its claims. Ms Nield said she stood by her comments.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/doctor-may-be-sued-for-criticism-of-breast-enhancement-cream-2130787.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the UK. Bastion of woo-ism.
I guess when your crown prince is a believer in quack science, and in court the fact that you were telling the truth is actually not a defense against libel, you're bound to get this kind of kooky crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. The British laws are not like our, truth is not always a viable defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a sad part of the British legal system.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC