Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Experts Revive Debate Over Cellphones and Cancer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:44 AM
Original message
Experts Revive Debate Over Cellphones and Cancer
What do brain surgeons know about cellphone safety that the rest of us don’t?

Last week, three prominent neurosurgeons told the CNN interviewer Larry King that they did not hold cellphones next to their ears. “I think the safe practice,” said Dr. Keith Black, a surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, “is to use an earpiece so you keep the microwave antenna away from your brain.”

Dr. Vini Khurana, an associate professor of neurosurgery at the Australian National University who is an outspoken critic of cellphones, said: “I use it on the speaker-phone mode. I do not hold it to my ear.” And CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a neurosurgeon at Emory University Hospital, said that like Dr. Black he used an earpiece.

Along with Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s recent diagnosis of a glioma, a type of tumor that critics have long associated with cellphone use, the doctors’ remarks have helped reignite a long-simmering debate about cellphones and cancer.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/health/03well.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Judge John Deed
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 11:52 AM by ananda
In the UK, there was a recent series called Judge John Deed,
where the judge had to rule on a case where the plaintiff
was dying of a brain tumor and suing the mobile phone company
for not disclosing the danger. It was a great show.

Those phone company executives and their lawyer were truly
slimy and evil. The plaintiff was to get some life-prolonging
treatment from a hospital and doctor, and the phone company
managed to keep the hospital from allowing the treatment. God
that was tough to watch, but the show was so interesting and
emotionally compelling, that I just had to watch it all the
way through.. and it was worth it!

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rec'ing for my uncle
who is in his early 50's and has inoperable brain cancer. He was always tied to his cell phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC