Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.C. Lawmaker's "Personal Difficulty" with Anti-Marriage Equality Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:00 PM
Original message
N.C. Lawmaker's "Personal Difficulty" with Anti-Marriage Equality Amendment
Boone, N.C. - When North Carolina's House Speaker Thom Tillis visited Appalachian State University on Monday for a Student Government Association-sponsored town hall event, he faced questions from crowds composed mostly of students and local residents, criticizing Republican majority decisions, including adding the anti-LGBT amendment to the May ballot. In response to questions of how the amendment, which would write discrimination into our state's founding document, would in any way defend the constitutional mandate of "liberty and justice for all," the Republican leader admitted he has difficulty with the amendment to the "extent to which government imposes its will on personal lives."

According to the political blog, WataugaWatch, Tillis admitted he has "a personal difficulty with constitutional amendment because I don’t believe government should be telling us what to do...".

Others in the Boone audience used the platform to denounce the discriminatory measure altogether, including one audience member who called the amendment simply “shameful." She continued, “Loving people should have the same rights as I do, a heterosexual person and an ordained minister.”

To which Speaker Tillis responded, “This is not an issue that I completely disregard some of the arguments you make."

http://equalitync.org/news1/ncs-republican-house-leader-admits-personal-difficulty-with-anti-lgbt-constitutional-amendment
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't necessarily need an ordained minister
A Court Clerk will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I believe that the person was saying that she herself is an ordained minister.
It's a little hard to tell, but I read it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thats how I read it also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. The legislator who pushed this amendment died a few weeks ago. God rest his soul.
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 01:59 PM by yardwork
We're watching the Republicans in North Carolina run away from this as fast as they can. It appears to have backfired on them. I predict that the amendment will fail this May. The collateral damage to the Republicans is not insignificant.

We still won't have equal marriage in North Carolina.

edit for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Since the issue is on the ballot for the primary election, it really matters who shows at the polls
2010 Primary Election turnout 14%
2008 Primary Election turnout 37%
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No Democrats will be running in this primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. The republicans are indeed a strange breed, they talk of small gov., no gov this/that, etc., and
yet at the same time they want to run and "rule" what should be peoples personal lives and decisions ... in many areas. They are so damn regressive, repressive and depressing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC