Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Desperate Measures for Prop. 8 Supporters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 02:42 PM
Original message
Desperate Measures for Prop. 8 Supporters
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/06/13/Desperate_Measures_for_Prop_8_Supporters/

A federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments today as to whether the landmark Proposition 8 decision by U.S. chief district judge Vaughn R. Walker should be thrown out because the now-retired jurist did not disclose his same-sex relationship.


Chief Judge James Ware, who is handling remaining trial-level issues concerning the Prop. 8 case following Walker’s retirement earlier this year, will hear arguments at 9 a.m. Pacific Time at the Phillip Burton Federal Building & United States Courthouse in San Francisco.

Supporters of Proposition 8 have argued that Walker’s unequivocal August ruling striking down the ballot measure as unconstitutional should be vacated because he did not disclose his long-term relationship when randomly assigned the case.

Upon Walker’s disclosure of his relationship in an interview with Reuters, proponents of the ballot measure that stripped California’s gays and lesbians of the right to marry have argued that there is “a reasonable basis for concern that Judge Walker has a direct and substantial personal interest in the outcome of the case and that his impartiality could reasonably be questioned.”

But the legal team led by attorneys Ted Olson and David Boies, who successfully argued against Prop. 8, has called the move “an utterly baseless attack on the integrity of the judicial system, on then-Chief Judge Walker, and on all gay and lesbian jurists who faithfully perform their duties and decide cases across this country each day.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. If same sex marriage threatebns all marriage, then only an unmarried
Judge can hear the case, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Walker *is* unmarried
The whole point of the prop 8 proponents' ridiculous claim is that he's biased because he might possibly someday stand to gain from the decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. This could go on and on...
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 08:56 AM by justiceischeap
If it's a black defendant, then you can't have a black jurist, opposite is true for caucasian and male and female, etc. With that argument no one should be able to be impartial to the "class" they belong to. So, I propose, only Dems can preside over Repubs and vice versa. A proclaimed Christian shouldn't preside over any cause that has any moral ambiguity (when that ambiguity is based on something the Bible says).

Unless of course these folks are claiming that only gay people can't be impartial jurists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Precious few unbiased
Married - Biased
Single - Biased
Heterosexual - biased
Gay - biased
Divorced - biased
Religious - biased
Liberal - biased
Republican - biased

any more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC