Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morning After Pill Study Contradicts Claims by Foes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:35 AM
Original message
Morning After Pill Study Contradicts Claims by Foes
Another example of the anti-choice, anti-women groups' lies, and the truth being revealed. But of course, this is only science, and we know how much the Talibornagains respect that.

Providing women with easy access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B did not lead them to engage in more risky sexual behavior, a study of more than 2,000 California women has concluded.

The study did find that women given a supply to keep at home were more than 1 1/2 times as likely to use the drug after unprotected sex as those who had to pick it up at a clinic or pharmacy. The findings led the study authors to conclude that easy access to Plan B, also called the morning-after pill, could reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies while posing no apparent risk to women.

The study contradicts a key claim made by opponents of easier access to Plan B at a time when the Food and Drug Administration is preparing to decide on a second application to allow nonprescription sales of the drug.

In an indication of the strong feelings on both sides, advocates of Plan B are planning a sit-in at FDA headquarters in Bethesda on Friday. Some protesters have called for civil disobedience if the FDA official who rejected the first Plan B application, Steven Galson of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, refuses to meet with them.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48377-2005Jan4.html

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. They throw this out because 15yr olds MIGHT have more sex
Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 12:21 PM by WildClarySage
and leave Vioxx on the shelf for years killing approximately 33,000.

I think I would have more sympathy for the FDA if they'd not been so blatently politically motivated by the whole issue of EC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC