Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

good article about machiavelli in Renaissance magazine......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU
 
RedXIII Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:05 AM
Original message
good article about machiavelli in Renaissance magazine......
it states that he was actually misunderstood.what are your take on the article?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I haven't read the article, do you have a link?
There is only one thing you have to remember about Machiavelli - his actual career. After little more than a decade as a minor politician, he never returned to power and the books for which he is remembered were published only after his death. Despite all the machinations over his writings, he was very unsuccessful.

He started in politics when he was 29 and was forced out when he was about 40. An age when most successful politicians are just hitting their stride, even in the 1400's. Then he went on to write but the bulk of his writing were published only after his death. Again, he was unsuccessful in his chosen career.

Listening to Machiavelli is like listening to a poor man tell you how to make money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RedXIII Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. here is the link....
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 04:39 AM by RedXIII
http://www.renaissancemagazine.com/


of course you need to buy the magazine at borders right next to British Heritage magazine. And there are many claims that he based the book "The Prince" on Caesar Borgia who he considered the emerging new style politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree. The Prince was supposed to be satire.
When I re-read it as satire, it made far more sense. He was lampooning his former bosses, which is why he never published it while alive. (I wouldn't have, either.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC