Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My name is Ken Blackwell and I need to guarantee a Bush win in OH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:41 AM
Original message
My name is Ken Blackwell and I need to guarantee a Bush win in OH
But I must do it with the majority of the counties using punch card ballots. I thought I was going to be able to do it with paper trailless BBV. But I can't. What is my Plan B?

OK the obvious is voter suppression and spoilage, but those are not quantifiable. I need to be able to guarantee a win. Are the punch cards themselves something I can tamper with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fnottr Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. are they scanned optically? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I believe a light passes through the punched holes
But the evidence (the punch cards) would make tampering with the reading equipment risky. Unless one could feign ignorance as to why they malfunctioned.

What if the supplier of the punch cards had two lots of cards. One for white suburban precincts and another for minority and liberal urban precincts? Wht if the cards were perforated differently? What quality controls are there? I have beenn unable to find out who supplies the punch cards.

Another question. Who checks the punch card machines before they are delivered to the precincts? A Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. One Trick I've Heard About
is adjusting the optical sensors on the machines that read opscan ballots to make them more likely to pass over ballots that are not not completely black, resulting in an undervote.

And of course, there are all the tricks used with paper ballots -- ballot box stuffing, losing stacks of ballots, and spoiling groups of ballots by double-punching them, as may have happened in Escambia County Florida in 2000.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. Punchcards can be "cooked".
People who wanted to draw attention to the "BBV" computer screens ignore tha fact that just about EVERY voting method can be rigged.

If nothing else, almost all voting systems involve SOME type of equipment to do the counting (this is the weak link some see as a problem in the optical scan counties).

Punch cards can be affected as simply as driving a pin through a stack of cards on the "Bush" hole. Anyone who voted for Bush is unaffected... while those who chose not to vote end up voting for Bush. Everyone else becomes an "over-vote" and they are "spoiled".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Spontaneous GOP punch card tricks or coordinated?
I need to guarantee a win. I cannot guess how many spoiled ballots and assume tricksters in so many places will be able to pull off their vandalism without being caught.

Has anyone seen any breakdowns for the 93,000 uncounted Ohio ballots. The ones that either register under or overvotes for president? We need to determine if their are any red flags. If there are we may know exactly where the tricks took place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't know that we'll hear any of that until it's too late.
Specific breakdowns of "non votes" aren't usually released untol well after the canvas... right?


The provisionals/absentees would have to tighten things up quite a bit before this would be a possible line of attack. And I don't see that happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course, there's the old trick they pulled in Florida.
They didn't clean the old chads out of the machines in poor districts. That way, the stiletto wouldn't go all the way through, and they had all the 'intent to vote for' questions that, as we all know, they never bothered to answer.

Another way might be to print the punch cards poorly, so the offsets on the print don't match the chads on the card. That way, you don't really know and can't tell by looking at your card whether your vote was registered correctly or not, even if it appeared to be correct when you had the card in the machine.

Or simply set up a few of the readers in a few precincts to 'accidentally' read votes for other candidates as votes for Bush. Just a few, here and there, would really add up.

Or lie about the totals, knowing the gap you caused in other ways -- suppression, ineffectual equipment in heavily Democratic precincts -- would guarantee the margin wouldn't be close enough for a recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. I would try to forbid exit polls in my state...
...and Ken Blackwell did just that. Why does no one in the national press try to question him about his motives for the bizarre election morning decree? That was the moment I knew the fix was in. Since all the major news people had to rush to court to get a restraining order, Ill bet they noticed it as it was happening too and wondered what was up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Paper-I really like different kinds of paper.
By weight. Heavy paper might not be read as well in the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. also harder to punch a hole through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kralizec Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've already gone through
the spoiled ballots and picked a few that did not have a presidential vote, "fix" them for *, and add them to the legit pile. Good thing I already did this before those damn liberals starting investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC