Response to the TruthIsAll FAQ and Links to Election Fraud Analytics

[WillE]

This is an updated response to the “TruthIsAll FAQ” by Mark Lindeman. Since 2005 Mark has been posting non-stop trying to debunk the work of scores of independent election analysts who cite pre-election and exit polls as powerful evidence that Kerry easily won the True Vote in 2004 and that the 2006 Midterms Democratic landslide was denied by election fraud.

http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/TruthIsAllFAQResponse.htm

[yowzayowzayowza]

1. UnRec. Finely-ground fossilized equine skeleton.

In an effort to establish at best indirect evidence, these nationwide election fraud analyses will always struggle to overcome uncertainty due to methodological and sample size issues of the underlying datasets (LV, RV, exits) that could easily mask millions of fraudulent votes, a dubious exercise of dubious value.

[WillE]

21. RECS = UNRECS +2

RECS = UNRECS +2
Despite your cabal's concerted efforts to UNREC the hell of out the OTOH TIA FAQ.

How many did you get: 5,10, 20?

I hope you rounded up 20 to UNREC.
The more the merrier.

RECS = UNRECS +2

22 RECS?

[1Hippiechick]

2. Deleted my post - went back and read Election Reform posts. n/t

[Stevepol]

3. K&R!

[autorank]

23. Steve!

:hi:

:kick:

Brilliant of course. Thanks so much for posting!

[Wilms]

4. Tales from the Crypt

TIA's Tombstone Tomes

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

5. chart that proves "TruthIsAll FAQ"

:woohoo:

[Bill Bored]

9. See post #8. nt

[WillE]

11. Tables and graphs are funny? ADDRESS THE CONTENT!

All of you who are mocking OTOH's FAQ should take a look at yourselves.

All you are doing is
a) kicking the thread
b) drawing attention to your reluctance (or inability) to address the content.

[Wilms]

12. Mocking who?

You really don't get it. Do you, TIA?

[WillE]

16. Wilms, you appear to be (W)ithout (I)nterest in (L)earning (M)ath (S)tatistics

Take a course.
You need one.

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

18. can you do that with my name, pretty please?

it might take you awhile, but it would be fun!

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

13. not mocking OnTheOtherHand

I'm just being naughty. I haven't picked on your thread, its ok with me if it gets recommended
and or bumped.

[tiptoe]

22. kick! n/t

[Bill Bored]

6. The Gun is Smoking!

I rest my case.

[Wilms]

7. You both are worng! Only MY proof is the correct and TRUE.

The lack of symmetry in this chart eludes the untrained eye. But if you look at it closely, it shows what I want to believe.




Look at the blue in this scatter plot which shows Kerry winning at 5PM. And the green brush mark to the right which is what Rove and Mitofsky got Connell to do while Spoonamore wasn't looking but knew what really happened.




And the shark... That's Rove, too.



Unmistakable.


And here's more proof of broken levers.




Did anyone even BOTHER to check fertility rates? Hmmm? I'm gonna have to start charging you all.





If you don't already know, don't ask me about it. OK?




I win.

[Bill Bored]

8. But none of that explains THIS:

It's obvious that you are getting desperate now Wilms, and continue to ignore the REAL analysis!

For example, this EKG from a voter who voted for Bush in 2000, taken shortly after that election...

2000: Voted for Bush:


...compared to this one, from THE SAME VOTER, taken right after she voted for Kerry in 2004:

2004: Voted for Kerry:


Clearly, the diffuse T wave inversions in leads I, II, V2-V6 show that she didn't remember who she had voted for in 2000, and that her vote in 2004 was switched without her knowledge.

EMS technicians working for Rove could have created enough of a disturbance at the polls for the election inspectors to unlock the lever machines and jigger the counters!

If we only had the RAW EXIT POLL DATA, we could correlate it with local 911 calls the day of the election and see which precincts had similar changes in voters' EKGs.

Oh but there's that damn confidentiality clause and the HIPPA regulations too! See: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/
All designed to subvert the will of the people!

[yowzayowzayowza]

10. Pffftht!!! All of you lack the TRUE tools for this analysis.

Mastery of such tools would lead you to transcendent understanding of the voting population modality...



...and time horizons...



...the Z plane would reveal the true source of evil:



Were you TRULY in touch the obvious historical maxims would be .... well obvious



...and before I bequeath you with the TRUE worth of this anaylysis, YOU MUST...



Now that you are worthy, behold the ultimate correlation of evil to ballot box:



Consider yourself ...

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

15. where's your birth certificate?

I want the real one! I demand it!

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

20. I am nut worng! here's teh proof

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

14. dangit, you've beaten my chart all to heck

darn you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

17. it would be nice to have a thread just for charts

there are so many awesome ones here I can't decide which is my favorite!

[Wilms]

19. I was like a kid in a candy shop googlin' images.

I just picked 'em out of thin air.

Kinda like TIA. :evilgrin: