Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great AP article in WaPo &NYT: Activists Sue to Block Electronic Voting!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 06:30 PM
Original message
Great AP article in WaPo &NYT: Activists Sue to Block Electronic Voting!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR2006071300989.html
Note that this AP excellent article by Deborah Hastings on the Voter Action lawsuits was picked up by both the WaPo and the NYTimes on Friday.
Is it happening?
Are the winds of change blowing!
Kudos to Deborah Hastings!

Activists Sue to Block Electronic Voting
The Associated Press, Friday 14 July 2006

Computerized voting was supposed to be the cure for ballot fiascos such as the 2000 presidential election, but activist groups say it has only worsened the problem and they've gone to court across the country to ban the new machines.

Lawsuits have been filed in at least nine states, alleging that the machines are wide open to computer hackers and prone to temperamental fits of technology that have assigned votes to the wrong candidate.

Manufacturers say their machines are more reliable than punch cards and other traditional voting technologies.

But they face a determined opponent in Voter Action, which has filed lawsuits in Colorado, California, Arizona and New Mexico. Similar bans have been sought by voters in Texas, Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania. On Thursday, a coalition of groups filed a lawsuit in Georgia.

"The designers of video games have built far more sophisticated security into their systems than have the manufacturers of voting machines," said Lowell Finley, co-director of Voter Action, a nonprofit and nonpartisan group based in Berkeley, Calif. "The biggest problem is security against tampering."

About 80 percent of American voters will use some form of electronic voting in the November election, where every seat in the House of Representatives is up for re-election, as are 33 Senate offices and 36 governorships.

New York University's Brennan Center for Justice released a one-year study last month that determined that the three most popular types of U.S. voting machines "pose a real danger" to election integrity.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR2006071300989.html

....
Finley says there is an easy solution to the problems.

"The best and simplest way is to have voters vote on paper," he said. "You can use modern technology - like scanners - to verify the vote," he said. "But you always have the assurance that you can go back and hand count those ballots.

http://www.voteraction.org





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good article. Every little bit helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. without the ability to do recounts, no election is legitimate
Edited on Sat Jul-15-06 07:29 PM by teryang
the recount problem was well known in the IT community before the HAVA legislation was passed. It makes you wonder why the legislation was passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hot Damn and Yes, yes, yes! Paper , paper, paper!
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 07:50 AM by mom cat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. The thing is, the pattern of machine fraud is so unambiguous.
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 08:39 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
In particular, I mean that, while it is incumbent on them to prove to the public the integrity of their machines and of the handling of the ballots, not only are they unable to even adduce tendentious evidence of such integrity, ALL the evidence that they might have produced, favours a massive, widespread perpetration fraud on both counts - ironically, backed up by equally overwhelmingly compelling statistics concerning the gallimaufrey of irregularities produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmmm, and only yesterday......
someone was saying how Georgia activists aren't doing a damn thing to fight these machines!

Who wudda thunk?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't know ...
if the study mentioned in the article released on June 27, 06 by the
NYU Brennan Center for Justice has been discussed here.
Called "The Machinery of Democracy: Protecting Elections in an Electronic World," it looks more comprehensive than the GAO report.
Lists all the known threats to all the systems and does not mince words about the implications. Good resource.
Here is the Executive Summary.
http://www.brennancenter.org/programs/downloads/SecurityExecSum7-3.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Honestly
Georgia activists are as good as anywhere, I'm sure. It's just that have obviously been hampered by a few bad apples on their tree, making their fruit look bad. I have heard that those few bad apples may have dropped off, so now they are making solid progress again.

Gotta love them Dogs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recommended
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 11:04 PM by Benhurst
I would have, but was told it was too late to do so. I wish I had seen this earlier. :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC