Which should have been mentioned in the uscountvotes.org final report?

[TruthIsAll]

Poll question: Which should have been mentioned in the uscountvotes.org final report?

On Edit: I don't know about y'all, but the report did not expand much on their 5-page January rebuttal to Mitofsky's 77-page report.

[BlueEyedSon]

1. I told you about them 2 months ago. The have a very egalitarian

mailing list, they discuss their stats and what goes in their docs quite a bit.

Did you try to interact with them and offer your excellent input?

I always thought you would be a good addition to their team.

[TruthIsAll]

2. I know they follow the work of DUers .

I did not try to contact them.

They must be conservative and focused.
I understand that.

But the final report said little more than the five-pager which debunked the Mitofsky report and the RBR theory in January.

[BlueEyedSon]

3. Yeah.

They have a bit of a "not invented here" complex. You have to get in their face.

Although I don't know how much time they spend here (DU) "looking for ideas."

[Melissa G]

4. you left out 'all of the above'...

[Melissa G]

5. I'm getting the impression that Kathy Dopp put it together but

They don't talk to each other much.

[Bill Bored]

6. Other

The change in party ID weighting from 38 D/35 R to 37/37 which was absolutely necessary to put Bush back in the ballgame in the final release of the poll (13,660).

And I still believe this is something that can be independently verified somehow.

I haven't read the report yet, but this should have been in there.
Was it?

[TruthIsAll]

7. I didn't see it. And you are 100% correct. It's a smoker.

Party ID
How voted in 2000
Gender/Race

These are the 3 biggies.

But How Voted is THE biggest, because it is PROVED TO BE MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE using HARD, VERIFIABLE NUMBERS.

BILL, YOU ARE GETTING HARD EVIDENCE OF PROGRAMMED FRAUD.
THE HOW VOTED DEMOGRAPHIC IS ALSO HARD EVIDENCE - OF EXIT POLL FRAUD.