Excerpts from
"
Risks to the Public in Computers
and Related Systems"
Peter G. Neumann and Contributors
January 2005 ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering “•
Diebold GEMS central tabulator contains a stunning security
hole: two-digit code alters results; this is a real doozer
(R 23 52)…”
“…• Earlier cases reported: New Mexico: at least 678 votes lost
in 2000 early voting, greater than the presidential margin (R
23 50, correction R 23 51); Lost records of 2002 Florida vote
raise 2004 concern (R 23 46); Alabama 2003, ES&S machines
reversed the governor’s race, not detected until long afterward!
Bev Harris records 51 cases in which voting machines
recorded the wrong outcomes, including Wayne County NC
(reversed in time); 100% error in Orange County in 1998 bond
issue (yes/no reversed)
(R 23 51; more on Bev Harris’s crusade,
R 23 45) her predictions were fairly prescient])…”
Most of the article is on my blog
http://chrisphoenix.forclark.com
Petition: Please visit and sign if you agree:
"Address The Biggest Threat To Our Democracy"
To: Electoral Reform Groups, U.S. CongressPetition Statement:
“We have grave concerns about voting in our Democracy. We believe the main threat to our Democracy is not currently being addressed.
Paper trails for ballots only matter if an election is close enough to "justify" a recount, and if an honest recount can be accomplished.
The Tabulators can be hacked into in order to create an artificially large difference in votes between candidates. So without a recount, the "paper trail," if it exists remains irrelevent.
If a recount is done, there is no guarantee it will be done openly and honestly (Ohio 2004), so again the paper trail may be irrelevant. Also recounts are costly as was seen this election cycle.
We have to get it right the first time, by addressing the Tabulator and Electronic voting problem. We need to get Electronic voting and hackable Tabulators out of our election system.
Until and unless they can developed with open source code and non partisan verification of their accuracy and security, we can not have faith in a system that relies on electronic voting and Tabulators.
Otherwise we see no point in taking part in any actions to demand a paper trail and/or deal with myriad types of vote fraud and intimidation. If we ONLY take care of all the other problems, we could easily find ourselves wondering again in 2006 and 2008 "what went wrong?"
We will not participate until and unless the Tabulator and Electronic voting problem is first or simultaneously addressed.”
It is hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free online petition
service, at:http://www.PetitionOnline.com/no4etabs/petition.htmlThanks
Chris
Repost: Feel free to distribute widely.