Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Check out what John Zogby has to say on the exit polls.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mdb Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:45 PM
Original message
Check out what John Zogby has to say on the exit polls.
John Zogby, President of Zogby International, a well-known polling company, said that such complete non-transparency is a “violation of polling ethics.” Under the American Association for Public Opinion Research code, Section III, Standard for Minimal Disclosure: “Good professional practice imposes the obligation upon all public opinion researchers to include, in any report of research results, or to make available when that report is released, certain essential information about how the research was conducted. {B}At a minimum, the following items should be disclosed, Part 8 - Method, location, and dates of data collection.”

There is a lot of info in the dissident voice article where Zogby makes this comment, but first check out American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Jan05/Landes0106.htm

When you check out AAPOR you find Mitofsky was president there and what the Code of Professional Ethics and Practices are exactly

Mitofsky worked as president of American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). He received AAPOR's Lifetime Achievement Award in 1999.
http://www.mitofskyinternational.com/company.htm

AAPOR is an association of about 1,600 individuals who share an interest in public opinion and survey research. Members work in a wide variety of settings, including academic institutions, commercial firms, government agencies and non-profit groups, as both producers and users of survey data. Election polling, collecting statistical data, conducting market research and improving methods for surveying individuals and institutions are just a few of the diverse research interests of AAPOR members.

Code of Professional Ethics and Practices

We, the members of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, subscribe to the principles expressed in the following code.

III. Standard for Minimal Disclosure

Good professional practice imposes the obligation upon all public opinion researchers to include, in any report of research results, or to make available when that report is released, certain essential information about how the research was conducted. At a minimum, the following items should be disclosed:

1. Who sponsored the survey, and who conducted it.

2. The exact wording of questions asked, including the text of any preceding instruction or explanation to the interviewer or respondents that might reasonably be expected to affect the response.

3. A definition of the population under study, and a description of the sampling frame used to identify this population.

4. A description of the sample selection procedure, giving a clear indication of the method by which the respondents were selected by the researcher, or whether the respondents were entirely self-selected.

5. Size of samples and, if applicable, completion rates and information on eligibility criteria and screening procedures.

6. A discussion of the precision of the findings, including, if appropriate, estimates of sampling error, and a description of any weighting or estimating procedures used.

7. Which results are based on parts of the sample, rather than on the total sample.

8. Method, location, and dates of data collection.

http://www.aapor.org/default.asp?page=survey_methods/standards_and_best_practices/code_for_professional_ethics_and_practices

For someone who was given a lifetime achievement award while president at AAPOR, he sure is not following the Code of Professional Ethics and Practices very well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice links - thanks.
No surprise that someone associated with the weed and his band of rethugs is not following professional ethical rules, no surprise at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yup n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great post. What are Mitofsky/MSM hiding, and when will ethics ...
of a research-based or journalistic strain re-enter their "reality-based" worlds? Specifically, when have the MSM indicated that they will release the raw exit polls? Like thousands of people, I am anxious to see their state-by-state "final" data and compare it with what DUers and others screen-saved before the great 2004 election "glitch" stole Christmas and Thanksgiving (and maybe our country).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very interesting post.
Has anyone in the MSM said they would release the raw data? We sure can't expect it from Mitofsky. At any rate, kudos to Zogby for asking for some accountability in the exit polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmmm------- sounds like Mitofsky is really hiding something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. good stuff, but what hope do we have when even my old apartment's...
management company doesn't even remotely adhere to its code of ethics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. what are these people hiding?
hey Blackwell, WTF are you hiding?

hey Mitofsky, WTF are you hiding?

hey Richardson, WTF are you hiding?

hey CNN, WTF are you hiding?

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? WHAT COULD IT BE? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe if we repeat it 3 times and click our heels they
will begin to talk? The only thing I can conclude about Richardson is he wants to run for President in 2008 and thinks playing the conservative role, OR HIDING HIS MISTAKES and possible complicity is necessary. All I know is he really lost my support in any venture he decides to pursue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. You quote the source...
..."the obligation upon all public opinion researchers to include, in any report of research results, or to make available when that report is released"

Shouldn't we wait until his report is released before we start accusing him of anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No. What's the fun in that? Anyway he says he can't and won't release it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. He won't release the exit poll raw data.
Of course he will release the final exit poll. The raw numbers for the exit poll, are not the same as the final exit poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwghlmian Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The raw exit poll data will be released
in a month or so, AFAIU, with the Roper center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdb Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No...
Because they have been asked to release this data and we hear ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and Fox News are needing to properly analyze this data. A simple mathematical analysis which is consisting of a mathematical analysis, by dozens of professional analysts and has been ongoing for over 2 months now. This alone raises a lot of suspicion.

And what I just posted adds to the belief that "they are hiding something."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. It must be 'hard work' trying to get the 'official' story straight
to sell to the public. Not to worry, the citizens are stupid enough to believe whatever they're told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. You're confusing the raw numbers collected on the day of the election...
...with the final exit poll. It's the raw numbers that we have asked for and not received.

"This alone raises a lot of suspicion."

How ? Without the analyis, the exit poll would be useless to the MSM. Have you Googled 'exit poll' lately to read how and they are conducted ? It's been 2 months. I expect it will take another month to actually make sense of the data.

It is taken as fact in this forum that previous exit polls in this country have been accurate. Well, every one of them had to go through the same "mathematical analysis, by dozens of professional analysts" as this one does. It raises absolutely no suspicion.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=284055#285192



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. The fix was in.
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 02:08 PM by iconoclastNYC
I think that there was an agreement between the pollsters, and the candidates and the media that no matter what, we would KNOW who won the night of the election. UNLIKE 2000 we are at war, and we can not endure another 30 day period of uncertainty.

And so that's why you had new procedures for including poll results in the final exit polls. And it made it all the easier to hide the last minute padding of the votes.

The MSM and the pollsters are hiding the conspiracy to put electoral certainty over true democracy.

How many pundits did you here before the election say they didn't care who won just as long as it was a certain victory. I think that's how they could justify going along with it. Because uncertainty would mean weakness and damage national security/ the war on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick, so I can read all this later. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Zogby is fuming!
He called the election for Kerry based on Mitofsky's "data."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Can't he be turned in to the AAPOR for violating the Code of Professional
Ethics and Practices? If he's a member, shouldn't he be expected to adhere to these practices just like the other members? Sounds reasonable to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdb Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Mitofsky probably came up with the professional code.
He was president of the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Mitofksy may be the "Father" of this stuff but he is vulnerable,
especially if others in his profession choose to attack him for being unproffesional. Is anyone besides Zogby challenging him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Professional review boards and
"codes of ethics" don't work and haven't been working for quite awhile. (Serious violators only get slaps on the wrist). Most professions do not adequately police themselves. Only in an ideal world. Research it--most Americans are incredibly naive about this. Zogby's challenge is all the more significant in light of that and I applaud his willingness to get involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ethical Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Haven't you heard? The "re-election" purged all accountability
By osmosis, and as a reward for loyalty, Mitofsky is absolved by the American people for his part in the charade. Perhaps he'll get the highly valued Medal of Freedom award, or whatever that useless thing is called now.

Ethics? We don't need no steenkin' ethics.

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC