Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds backtrack on promise to review anthem (ROFL, that didn't take long!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:05 PM
Original message
Feds backtrack on promise to review anthem (ROFL, that didn't take long!)
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 05:10 PM by Spazito
Feds backtrack on promise to review anthem

OTTAWA — Two days after promising to review the wording of the English version of the national anthem to make it "gender-neutral," the Prime Minister's Office shelved those plans in the wake of "overwhelming" opposition to the idea.

(This is it, just one paragraph)

http://www.canada.com/news/national/Feds+backtrack+promise+review+anthem/2646854/story.html

I love it! It seems the need to prorogue Parliament in order to consult with their members, etc, didn't quite work out that way, lol.

:rofl:

Edited to add another article with more info on this:

Conservatives ditch plan to revise anthem

The Harper government announced this afternoon that it is abandoning its promise to make the national anthem gender neutral by taking out the reference to “sons command” and replacing it with its original lyrics – “true patriot love thou dost in us command.”

“The Government will not proceed any further to change our national anthem,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman Dimitri Soudas said late this afternoon. “We offered to hear from Canadians on this issue and they have already spoken loud and clear.”

“They overwhelmingly do not want to open the issue.’

The suggestion to change the lyrics – one line in a 6,000 word Speech from the Throne – captured the imagination of Canadians. It also drew the ire of many in the Conservative base.

more

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/conservatives-ditch-plan-to-revise-anthem/article1491641/



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL no it sure shows nobody had been consulted
on THAT one!

So much for 'recalibrating'.

Taber has:

'“The Government will not proceed any further to change our national anthem,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman Dimitri Soudas said late this afternoon. “We offered to hear from Canadians on this issue and they have already spoken loud and clear.”

“They overwhelmingly do not want to open the issue.’

The suggestion to change the lyrics – one line in a 6,000 word Speech from the Throne – captured the imagination of Canadians. It also drew the ire of many in the Conservative base.'


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/conservatives-ditch-plan-to-revise-anthem/article1491641/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was just a bit of fluff to distract people
The budget was pretty bland, so I think they threw this in as something to talk about. I was surprised that they didn't try to keep this going, so that they could claim they saved the anthem from evil feminists or something like that. They probably did some polling and found that most people thought the whole thing was trivial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess Canadians aren't so easily distracted as harper had hoped...
as usual his political acumen comes out of his ass, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Apparently phones lit up in every Con riding office
across the country...within an hour Harp was suggesting merely a committee to 'study it'

The budget is dreadful tho, so I hope it gets some attention now
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe they were throwing a bone to their base, then
So that they could say "see, we listened to you traditionalists on the anthem, we really are responsive".

Sure it would be cheap, cynical manipulation showing contempt for their supporters. What else is new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. At the risk of offending women voters
who are 52% of the population? Quite a gamble.

Steve is out-clevering himself again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC