Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Redistricting not dead?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:17 PM
Original message
Redistricting not dead?
Thursday, December 1, 2005

Redistricting not dead?

Lawmakers say they're working on reapportionment reform

By DANIEL WEINTRAUB

Of the four measures backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and rejected by the voters Nov. 8, the one with the greatest chance of living on in another form is Proposition 77, his proposal to take the job of drawing political boundaries away from the Legislature.

(snip)

While little understood by most voters, the art of drawing district lines is the DNA of our political system, the basic building block from which all other decisions flow. How the lines are drawn can influence what kind of people get elected, how they interact with each other and how they do their jobs, even if the partisan mix remains essentially unchanged.

(snip)

SCA3 would create a five-member commission, with four members appointed by legislative leaders from a pool nominated by a panel of retired judges. Those four would choose the fifth member, who would not be a member of either party and who would, in effect, be a swing vote... But picking the commission is only half the task. The rules under which it operates can be just as important.

Lowenthal's bill and Prop. 77 both required the line-drawers to pay heed to the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minorities from having their influence diluted by overly creative boundaries. Both also sought to minimize the splitting of cities and counties into separate districts. But unlike Prop. 77, Lowenthal's proposal also called for the recognition of what are known as "communities of interest," a term that could lead to just about anything.

(snip)

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/opinion/columns/article_866598.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SF Bay Area Dem Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um... didn't the voters of California speak and reject this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. The method, not the idea
This state has some districts that are gerrymandered horribly, and that really does need to be fixed. It was the Ahnold plan that was rejected, not redistricting reform itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. you want to see some screwed up districts
take a look at the Georgia congressional map

that map would make Picasso proud

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC