Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Graham's whine reminds me of those who ask "how come black people can say n*gg*r but WE can't?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:51 PM
Original message
Graham's whine reminds me of those who ask "how come black people can say n*gg*r but WE can't?
Lindsey Graham's incessant whining that he would be out of a job if he had said what Sotomayer said smacks of white entitlement and fear of loss of superior status that have become more and more prevalent among the right wing in recent years.

How often have you heard a white person - usually someone who is considerably less than open-minded on issues of race - insist on knowing why "black people can use the n-word but white people can't?" I usually have two responses to such an inane question. 1) Why would you WANT to say it? and 2) You can't. Just trust me on this one.

Graham's question totally ignores the plain fact that, in this America, white men have always been in a position in which concerns about their qualifications and right to be where they are have never been questioned. They have also created an environment in which they benefit from race without race ever having to be explicitly mentioned or invoked - the advantage is so ingrained in our institutions that it operates automatically without need for any specific words or action.

On the other hand, minorities and women must assert themselves differently in order to just be included in the mix. Yet, when we do, certain white men scream bloody murder, pretending that the playing field is even and that any mention of race somehow disadvantages THEM because THEY CAN'T SAY IT! Of course, given the circumstances, white men need never mention race in order to benefit from it. Therefore, any white man who DOES mention it is usually doing so in order to achieve an even greater advantage than society naturally provides them, i.e., they often are racists seeking to subjugate others. THAT's why a white man who says something along the lines of Sotomayer's comment might find himself out of a job.

But Graham's "concern" about whether Sotomayer is "getting away" with something he can't do reveals a remarkable sense of entitlement and a deep-seated fear that we're seeing more and more these days - that the advantage that white men have been accorded in this country are being counterbalanced by minorities and women who are actively working to even the playing field - and succeeding at it. It must be very frightening to those who feel so woefully inadequate that they must promulgate and perpetuate false advantages, giving themselves a "head start" in order to compete with people they have always assumed to be less deserving of equal opportunity. And it must be enormously frustrating for the same people who consistently tell us to stop playing the "victim card" and to just get over it to see that there is at leastto feel that there is at least one thing that a minority can do that they can't do must be very frust

Wouldn't it be lovely if Judge Sotomayer could just answer Graham with, "Because I can and you can't, Senator. Get over it." . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another perfect case of white folks deliberately ignoring history...
so that that whine won't be immediately laughed at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. love this! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought the exact same thing.
When Obama is refereed to in monkey terms it is a racist slur. But I saw on TV, in the defense of using the monkey term, someone try to show that the left has refereed to Bush as a monkey for years. I scratched my head at the stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Graham misses the old days
when, to quote from American Dad "when white men had all the power, rather than just most of it". Wouldn't we all here at DU just love to smack him upside his thick skull?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sotomayor most likely did not mean...
what was implied by that statement. Even in context, the statement doesn't look great, but from her record it is obvious she is not some sort of racist. And she has apologized for the use of wording etc. etc. It's true that a white man would face more scrutiny over saying something like that, and no, it's not fair, but it's no more of a reason to try to crucify Sotomayor for it either. If you are a white male, you will be accused of racism/sexism quicker than others it is true because of history, so you just have to understand that and operate at a different level like other groups have had to do for decades to move beyond issues of race. Something that is unfair and unjust will eventually be shown for what it is, and the idea that only white males can be racist has been shown to be wrong over and over and the ideas are shifting on that issue, just like it is on other issues, towards justice. Taking it out on Sotomayor is missplaces and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great analogy! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Certainly felt that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. how does one pronounce n*gg*r.
I sound like a choking tiger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. the repugs are just pissed as they have no real way to torpedo this normination
all they can do it play to their own base, make a pitch for more campaign contributions from the bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Beatiful tie-in to the "Dear Scared White Men of America" thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6062136

White men will get used to being in the 21st century soon enough. I think many already have. And for the ones that haven't, that's okay because the rest of the world will still keep right on marching on.

Happy to rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is exactly what I thought!!! Great Post!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Graham is the biggest whiner of the entire Senate
A racist little brat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. Mark Pryor, D Arkansas
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 06:37 AM by Starry Messenger
"you don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate..."

-Religulous
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTSCRoYyM-Y

I'm guessing Sen. Graham is not owning his white privilege. I couldn't watch, his whining was putting me off my dinner. Her remark was so mild I can't believe this is even an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. Graham is a fool...
but Sessions and Grassley appear to have simply fallen out of reality into some obscure world where only their views "count". Of all of the possible situations where they might have had a valid argument against Sotomayor, they chose the most base and crass item they could find, and it's a losing proposition for not just them, but for the GOP as a whole. Once again, the R's have shown an capacity for portraying themselves as the party of race/gender baiting and intolerance.

As for the use of the "n-word"...just my opinion, but if no one would use it, it would disappear from the lexicon. Do I expect that to happen, no; but it would be a start if everyone let it, (and all such derogatory words), go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I agree with you about the n-word - no one should use it
But those persons I'm referring to aren't making that argument. They're upset that other people seem to have the "allowed" to say something that they're not supposed to say, as if they are being deprived of the "right" to use racist language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah...I know...
they use that reasoning to justify their own bigotry. Realistically speaking, it is a false argument, while it might "appear" to be logical, in this case, the word itself is inflammatory to the extreme. But the fires it starts, is not necessarily the word itself, but how and by whom it is used.

Fortunately, the use has dwindled to being far less used than before. If it were never it would be better...but sadly, every group of people has other ways of defaming and denouncing others...:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. Kick for this a.m.--'cause I thought this OP so good.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. And, why do these morons keeps saying 'wise Latino' rather than 'Latina!'
Ignorant bigots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. agree and well said - K&R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. bravo!
you know, i was going to get myself all worked up and watch the confirmation hearing yesterday, but i decided not to because i knew i would bust a gasket..and quite possibly my television.
reading about it here was hard enough. great post :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC