Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's Hoping That Kerry Begins Announcing His Cabinet Choices (His Team)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 05:29 PM
Original message
Here's Hoping That Kerry Begins Announcing His Cabinet Choices (His Team)
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 06:07 PM by David Zephyr
John Kerry can get some of the big headlines he now wants and help his campaign in a big way by announcing his Cabinet choices before the election. It's a win-win for Kerry to do so and here's why:

1.) MASS EXODUS OF BUSH'S CABINET EXPECTED AFTER NOVEMBER: George Bush will be losing almost his entire current Cabinet "super stars" --- the ones that hold his hand and spoon feed him daily -- after the election. So the question is who will be minding the store should Bush win? By announcing his choices for Cabinet Level positions soon, Kerry can immediately take the lead on a story that begs the question of: who will be there at Bush's side for the next four years?

2.) BUILDING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE BY ANNOUNCING YOUR "TEAM": Think back and consider: When public doubts about George W. Bush's ability to govern arose during the 2000 campaign, the green-behind-the-ears Governor of Texas quickly began announcing who would be joining him in the White House...to give him "gravitas". Remember? The names of Colin Powell and Dr. Condi Rice and a host of other "seasoned" veterans from Reagan and Bush I administrations were dangled before the American people to reassure them that this goofy Bush kid wouldn't be alone at the helm of the nation. If this worked for a proven idiot, how much more will this benefit the very bright and experienced John Kerry?

The American public is rightly or wrongly worried about terrorism, the events unfolding in Iraq, the economy, jobs, healthcare and more. Senator Kerry can begin rounding out what his administration would look like now and put names and faces on the individuals who would be joining him in helping tackle these great problems that face our nation.

3.) FOCUS ON KERRY'S TEAM ANNOUNCEMENTS WILL DRAW MEDIA ATTENTION: With each Cabinet announcement, Kerry can generate "news" of his own and also seize that opportunity to showcase how the current administration has miserably failed. A few examples:

a.) The Bush State Department: Colin Powell's catastrophic failure at at international diplomacy and the country's subsequent loss of respect around the world. Powell has indicated that he will not be staying on for a second Bush term. Who will?

b.) The Bush Treasury Department: Both John Snow and Paul O'Neill along with Bush's other economic advisers Harvey Pitt and Larry Lindsey (three have resigned in disgrace) have led the U.S. economy into the first net job loss since Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression. Will Snow, like O'Neill and Pitt and Lindsey also depart? I'm certain that Senator Kerry will appoint a superstar to fill the Treasury position, but who is it? Tell the American people, John. Help them visualize the positive change you will be bringing to government.

c.) The Bush Labor Department: Elaine Chao abused her high level Cabinet position within the White House to the point of high level treason as she oversaw millions of American jobs outsourced to China. Can American literally "afford" to have this woman continue on for four more years outsourcing their employment and livelihoods? Kerry will make a sterling appointment here, but who? Tell the American people, John. Show them the face of who will be standing at your side fighting to keep American jobs here, fighting for better paying jobs here.

d.) The Bush Defense Department: Donald Rumsfeld, who has also indicated that he will not be part of a new Bush II administration, has so botched the War in Iraq, mishandled the aftermath in Iraq after the initial invasion, blew his chance to capture Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan, embarrassed the nation with his authorization of torture of prisoners of war, and worse, lied repeatedly to the American people, that his exit will be leaving a house of cards behind him. Bush will also have this vacancy to fill, but who will Senator Kerry, a decorated veteran of a foreign war himself, have standing with him to help keep the peace in the world, to help facilitate a safe and timely withdrawal from Iraq? Flesh out your vision, Senator Kerry, by announcing your team...and in so doing, you will be able to simultaneously juxtapose your serious and thoughtful leadership against the scary growing vacuum within the Bush Administration.

d.) National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson have all told associates that "they don't plan to stick around." Even John Ashcroft, we have been told, will not be around to head the Justice Department and the FBI. Who will Bush appoint? Kerry can ease the American people's concerns with "change" by now showcasing his team.

4.) BY ANNOUNCING KERRY'S CABINET TEAM, IT ALSO SPOTLIGHTS THAT GEORGE W. BUSH --- A MAN KNOWN TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS LIKEABLE, BUT DAFT AND VERY DEPENDENT ON HIS STRONG ADVISERS --- IS ASKING FOR A SECOND TERM OF FOUR YEARS WHILE OUR NATION IS AT WAR AND THE ECONOMY IS IN THE TANK WITHOUT TELLING US WHO HIS CABINET REPLACEMENTS WILL BE.

So there it is, Kerry can seize news media attention with each announcement and the subsequent media reporting of each candidate, can point to the mass exodus of Bush's advisers and therein create focus on Bush's need for advisers, and can point out that he is ready to assume the office of the presidency in these troubled times with a great, capable team of seasoned and respected advisers who are ready to lead our nation to greatness again, both stronger at home and respected (again) in the world.

Play your cards John. Show the American people the strong hand that you have and at the same time...call George W's bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. here, here
No time to lose, hit the ground running...great post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks.
By announcing his cabinet choices, Kerry will help force the media to cover the "issues" at hand whether they want to or not. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ditto, this would give me something to say when I canvass for voter
registration in minority neighborhoods. It's hard to say, "Hey, vote for Kerry because he's better than Bush," and they ask what will he do for minorities and I don't have a reply. Kerry really needs to energize the black community to be hard core democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George W. Dunce Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I believe he said
on Imus the other morning that it would be inappropriate to announce any cabinet positions before winning the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If He Said That, I Hope He'll Reconsider.
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 06:37 PM by David Zephyr
I didn't hear Kerry say this, however I feel strongly about this and am hopeful that someone in his campaign might see this here and ponder it.

John Kerry with just a single term Senator, John Edwards, at his side are asking America to change the entire executive branch in the middle of a war and the enonomy on the brink.

Kerry can ease the fear of change and butress up himself with nervous voters by showing who will be taking the reigns of government with him in January and that he's ready to fill the void.

Sooner or later, this question will be asked. Kerry can lead rather than react to a genuine and very fair question: who's going to be with you in January?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Controlling the media hose is important
If cabinet choices were at least "trial-ballooned" with the least controversial/best reputation choices, it could have a great impact and steer media conversation.
I think JK and JE have been doing a great ground level job, and the weakness has been the support network and message discipline of proxy dems on TVmedia, with some notable exceptions.
Clark and Dean have been good, but there has been the usual scattered defense/offense. This could be a good way to mitigate that.


NYC - RNC March, a progressive coalition lifts up the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I Agree.
I think it rounds out Kerry and gives him a chance to show the American people what a Kerry administration might look like.

Just carping at Bush is one thing, but showing where you want to go is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think it would be a mistake...here's why
Anyone mentioned as a possible member of the Cabinet or an advisor would suddenly be open to investigation by the GOP. You can bet any dirt would be dug up by Rove and thrown all over the Kerry campaign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Of Course, That Goes Without Saying.
and I considered that, but naming Dick Gephardt as your Secretary of Labor would hardly be a risky choice, or perhaps General Wesley Clark as your Secretary of State, or Laura Tyson as your Secretary of the Treasury...there's no downside to these choices.

They are all great Americans who have had their backgrounds checked more than a few times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah...but
it just opens the door to unnecessary attacks that divert from the issues.


BTW, is that avatar of yours a pic of Half Dome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yosemite.
Half Dome indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I agree.....
if his cabinet choices are already vetted, what difference can it make but to make people feel even more secure.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's a great idea....my 1 question is this....
why is his cabinet high-tailing it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Here's One News Story on the Bush Cabinet Exodus.
Glad you agree, MsTryska.

Our idiot boy president is about to have NO CABINET WHATSOEVER with America in a war and the economy bleeding away.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-bush-cabinet,0,5541236,print.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

And here's a thread from here at the DU at the time.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=834670
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thanks David....
i totally missed all this. appreciate the links.


and the idea of condi as secretary of state scares the bejesus out of me.

i'm glad colin's gettign away from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. No, it would open Kerry up to attacks of politicalizing cabinet choices
I used to think this was a good idea too, but I think it best that Kerry not open himself up to unnecessary attacks and same for the people he might choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm sure Kerry thinks it would be presumptuous. and
he would certainly be attacked as such.
Hints maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drbtg1 Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. It gets air time, but....
....all these people really should be vetted properly, Rice and Powell appealed to certain moderate demos, and Powell was a superstar, politically speaking. What democrat would have the appeal that Powell had in 2000, pre-UN crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC