Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enzi (R-Wyo.) thinks the Dems have enough votes in the Senate for health care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:20 PM
Original message
Enzi (R-Wyo.) thinks the Dems have enough votes in the Senate for health care
At this moment, according Enzi’s office, the assumption among Senate Republicans is that the Democrats have the votes needed to pass the bill without bipartisan support.

“You have to assume that they have the votes to get it through. As far as we can see, it looks like they can get it through on a narrow margin,” Craig Orfield, Enzi’s press secretary, told CNSNews.com. “Perhaps a substantial margin, but certainly they got the vote for a narrow margin between 51 and 55 votes.


I sure hope so.

“Everything they’re doing so far in term of sharing information seems to indicate they’re not interested in a truly bipartisan bill,” he added.


Fuck you.

*ahem*

Sorry.

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=49351
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. a narrow margin between 51 and 55 votes
But, we need "60 votes" to insure anything can get passed..........

(Says the brave Harry Reid.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, we don't need 60 votes for health care because of reconciliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Not on this because there was a provision in the budget that this will
be done via the "reconciliation" process that needs just 50. (Remember there was a big fight over that with Republicans claiming it was no fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. dump bipartisan, check. now if we could get a bill that's GOOD for the USA....we shall see nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It doesn't matter...don't forget the ConservaDem where one of them already made public she's voting
NO
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. He knows the ConservaDems will fuck us up. We have nothing in the Senate so far. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. bipartisanship, then and now ...
before 1/3/2007: Bipartisanship meant they were able to bribe EXACTLY ONE Democrat to vote for their bill ...

After 1/2/2007: Bipartisanship means every Republican has to have his (or her) ass kissed and everything that makes it a "Democratic" bill has to be stripped from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is encouraging - Enzi is the ranking member on the HELP committtee - so he is the one who
should know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. lol! Republicans must find it hard to get up in the mornings. I hope Franken gets seated soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC