Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Members to Obama: Rethink Afghanistan Surge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 04:12 AM
Original message
House Members to Obama: Rethink Afghanistan Surge
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 04:13 AM by democracy1st
House Members to Obama: Rethink Afghanistan Surge posted by John Nichols


Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.

"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000 Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.

Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.

The full letter from the House members reads:


Dear Mr. President:

We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional 17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you to reconsider such a military escalation.

If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of governing itself, this military escalation may well be counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."

The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.

In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas' goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note..."

We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence in Afghanistan.

We are also concerned that any perceived military success in Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the region and would increase hostility toward the United States.

Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000 Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even further.


In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from across the ideological spectrum, including:


Michael D. Ostrolenk, President, American Conservative Defense Alliance

Mary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)

Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace

Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus

Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)

Tom Hayden

Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies

Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy

Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide

(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns

Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement

Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action

John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows

Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)

Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)

Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War

Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace

Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious affiliations.)

Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions



http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/423677/house_members_to_obama_rethink_afghanistan_surge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's nice to see a cross section of people
support this. It's just common sense. But it looks like Obama is still going to peddle the "war on terror" myth. I was disappointed to see him use the G-20 to perpetuate and reinforce the myth. He's just digging a deeper hole for himself and our coutry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. My People.
Proud to stand with them.
Delighted to see a collective voice is emerging.
I can sing with that band.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice try but the President won't do it. Perhaps if we weren't already there
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 07:55 AM by Kdillard
and this was a new proposal but we are there and he campaigned saying he believed we had taken our eyes off the ball in terms of our real threats and Afganistan/Pakistan was a problem. I also don't see anything there that I am sure he hasn't already been told and considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC