Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Air Traffic Controller moment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:44 PM
Original message
Obama's Air Traffic Controller moment?
Edited on Mon Mar-16-09 04:53 PM by themaguffin
He needs to be firm (yes he was harsh today) and provide not just a liberal response to uncontrolled greed, arrogance and overall assholish behavior by AIG (and others frankly) but the liberal view is the American view now and the country is hungry for action. AIG needs to get its act together.

Perhaps it means that the executives etc go and go quickly

Perhaps this would be a good time to also get rid of Geithner (or others if necessary) - I don't want to unfairly attack him - but Obama needs informed, competent people who are also NOT part of the crowd that brought us here.

In any case, the country is ready to explode and strong, swift, bold action of some capacity would not only send a message to these companies, but to the country, that his administration ain't messing around and this bullshit must end and we are on a path to get out of this mess as long as the companies get on board and that also they are in no position to fuck with Obama or the American people.

Reagan had his terribly flawed ideology and it followed with the Bushes.

They brought us here and some real tough love from a liberal is what will get us out.

Edited for clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is it that Geithner did again to merit being dismissed?
Edited on Mon Mar-16-09 04:46 PM by FrenchieCat
Do you know? Or are you just going along with the media cackle?

I'm tired of the fake ass populist shit.

Keep it up, and you will find yourself with any health care reform, no education reform,
and us still buying our oil from Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No my comment is made in general, whether it be
him or other financial leaders who happened to have been involved in this mess in some capacity.

I am saying if he or they are part of the problem, then that needs to change.

We should not be asking AIG and others - we should be telling them go get their shit together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 54 fucking days for 10 years of deregulation
is pretty unreasonable.

Like I said, I'm tired of the fake ass populism schtick that folks are adopting
as they criticize, although they barely know shit, and fake like they know
about finances now....but had no clue like just 6 months ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. 28 years of deregulation.
This whole mess was in the making since the Reagan years. Y'know, when Reagan had his air-traffic-controller moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Jesus, my point is about AIG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. It is being reported that Tim only cut 1/2 of the bonus amounts to Execs
If that is true he messed up. He should have cut all bonus amounts to execs and done a thorough review of the remaining amount.

Now, I understand that this administration was handed a shit pile of problems, has a Justice Dept. that is a complete mess, and is working their collective asses off. But Geithner should step up and admit the mistake and move on. (not be fired but admit to a mistake)

By moving on they should slam the living shit out of AIG execs and make a HUGE example of them. A few repubs will jump sides and start slamming the administration for being too hard on AIG, but it will go over like a fart in church in this environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why should he get rid of Geithner?
Just because the greedy whiners on Wall Street don't like him? Tough shit.

IMO, firing Geithner would send exactly the wrong message. And, I still don't understand why he should be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. see my second post. & btw, they like him, they helped PICK him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. uh oh, the worshippers are gonna get you for that :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. But the Obama haters will be right there to keep the balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Look quick! The OBama Haters are right behind you!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.








Made you look! :rofl:















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. President Obama selected him,
and Geithner never worked or got rich on Wall Street.

They liked him only long enough to tear him down.
The same as they do with anyone they don't like from the get.

And by the way, I'm tired of watching the fucked up Corporate media
deciding when we are to have a populist movement.
What kind of manipulative shit is this for us to be falling for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Wall Street didn't pick him or anyone else.
And Wall Street may have liked him the past, but they don't do anything but bitch about him now. Which means, he's probably doing a good job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Because he represents the banksters and Wall Street tycoons, not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. What about President Obama?
What's your beef with him?

I know for a fact you dislike him with a passion....
but can I ask you why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Obama should follow the advice of credible economists such as
Nuriel Roubini, Paul Krugman and others who are not acting as agents for Wall Street crooks who caused the economic crisis.

If he follows the advice of the Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve head Obama will be a one-term President.

Read what people who want Obama to do well and want to prevent a depression have to write and say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Uh, those greedy whiners on Wall St. actually LOVE Geithner
He's the one pumping more bailout billions into their pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, Reagan is still vilified for his 1981 decision.
He set ATC back 10-12 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. so we should do nothing about AIG?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Is nothing being done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'm just advising that a phrase other than "Air Traffic Controller moment" might be wise.
...especially because, while the strike was admittedly illegal, ATCs didn't show the incompetence and malfeasance that the people you have sggested firing have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I'm not comparing the people
I am saying that AIG needs to straighten up or suffer.

I am saying they should be told to do ____, not asked.

I think they should be given a choice and maybe 2 days decide. More money, then you WILL do this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. He would have been vilified even more had there been a malor
air disaster attributed to firing ATCs. I remember there being a lot of near misses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. If I recall correctly
A Delta Jet went down in Dallas due to wind sheer. The pilot died and on tape asked twice (?) "are you sure" when told to land. Final blame was placed on the pilot and crew, they had the right to override ATC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I don't remember that. I meant to say 'major'
I'm usually so good at proof-reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. I keep seeing post stating get rid of Geithner what is the reason for the outrage?
Geithner has been on the job less that the 50+ days, and I cannot believe people are not willing to give him a chance. The administration walked into the biggest pile of shit history and as I've posted before miracles do happen,and we did not elect our President because he was a miracle worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Geithner is NOT the purpose for this thread
AIG is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. How can we not want the crooks out? Isn't that a no brainer?
What's this liberal shit? This is America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. You either mispoke REAL bad...
or don't belong here. Ronald Reagan destroyed a segment of the middle class and set the agenda to destroy the regulations that supported much of the middle class. You seem to oppose million dollar bonuses. That to me is a good thing. But to imply Obama either should act like or would be acting like Reagan by spiking these bonuses is total bullshit. Reagan FIRED middle class workers. If spiking ripping off the taxpayers for over 10 years worth of a high middle class salary GIVEN AS A BONUS on top of a normal salary in 6 OR 7 figures equates to the same thing for you, you are mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. What Reagan did was horrible and this is the opportunity to do the opposite
I am not suggesting that Reagan did something good.

In fact I am saying the opposite.

What I am also saying that this could be the reverse opportunity - a chance to set Wall St and the like straight (and no I have no illusions that swift action will make everything ok everywhere).

So calm down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC