Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry challenges Bush on Saddam 9/11 connection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:23 PM
Original message
Kerry challenges Bush on Saddam 9/11 connection
of course, Kerry shouldn't have to do this, this should be a major scandal every time Cheney utters his big lie...

But, since Kerry has to do the whores' work for them, the timing is good with the Powell statement, Kerry can pit Powell vs. Cheney...

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/12/kerry.powell.iraq/

<snip>

In his statement Sunday, Kerry complained that Cheney "continues to intentionally mislead the American public by drawing a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 in an attempt to make the invasion of Iraq part of the global war on terror.

"The president needs to answer the question: Who do you think is right? Vice President Cheney or Secretary Powell? And if it's Secretary Powell, will you direct your vice president to stop misleading the American people?"

The Kerry statement continued: "On an issue of such importance, where U.S. troops are bearing nearly 90 percent of the burden, and American taxpayers are paying $200 billion and counting, the administration has an especially solemn obligation to conduct itself in an honest and straightforward way.

"Unfortunately, in its desperate attempts to reinvent a rationale for the Iraq war, this White House has repeatedly chosen to mislead the American people."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Kerry complained " ??
Groan. I hate CNN !! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Charged" should have been the word.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. or "reported"
or is CNN unfamiliar with that concept?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Probably so.
Considering that they don't report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Next time Chimpy wants to take issue with Kerry, it better be "W whined...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oooh, W is for whiner...
Now that the Rubicon has been crossed, Kerry now has to hammer the issue of deliberate misleading on the connection. If it comes back to him that he was somehow "duped" by the administration, he has every right to say that "we're supposed to trust our government, I didn't think they'd deliberately scare the American People to get their way, yet it appears that this is precisely what they've done."

If he's insulted for being a rube, he can fire back that it's shocking to find out how unprincipled and duplicitous this mob is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstateblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. To Hell With CNN- Glad I Don't Watch Faux Lite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great statement! Glad he's coming around.
*applause*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. agreed
smart, quick comeback...i was thinking the same thing when wateching MTP this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. finally
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 08:16 PM by gasperc
make them fucking prove it, I'm sick of all these republicans around work, I don't care what anybody says I KNOW Saddam had something to do with 9/11, it's like thier same faith in how they believe in God.

What could be Saddam's motive? Since such an attack would immediately draw worldwide suspicion against Iraq?
From all the bank transactions, thousands of arrests how come a pile of evidence hasn't emerged showing that Iraq financed 9/11?
Or atleast Iraq financed a sub-group of a sub-group of a sub-group of al Qeada? Even I would be seduced by something THAT shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC