|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:35 PM Original message |
Why the Republicans are Piling On Palin-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. They don't have to worry. The country knows she's a fraud already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. One thing about Republicans, they will use WHOMEVER they can get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yes, they USE the crazies. They do not want that relationship reversed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. The fundie social conservatives have already taken over the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. You're totally right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. You may very well be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Right on. They took it over in 1980 with Reagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I don't think they took it over. I think the party took them over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yep...shoulda' vetted that one, doggone it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. Panning like 1898 Cheechakos! Wow. harsh, yet obscure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. OK, so I OD'd on Robert Service when I was a kid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. hmm retroactive vetting --- get over there and close that barn door -- where is the horse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. An umanageable idiot narcissist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good scapegoats are hard to come by. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FKA MNChimpH8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
13. After reading the New Yorker article about how Moosey emerged on the VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm gonna support Palins 2012 run for president. I know fundies who switched votes because of her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. I agree--they know they created a monster, and if they want to put their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. Like I said before, after this election she won't be able to be elected to dog catcher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
18. They have serious base issues brewing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC