Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*** ALL GORE AND KERRY STATES NOW SOLID BLUE!!! ***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:06 AM
Original message
*** ALL GORE AND KERRY STATES NOW SOLID BLUE!!! ***
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 08:09 AM by IWantAnyDem
Check it out on Electoral-Vote.com. Every last Gore and Kerry State is solidly true blue.
Virginia and Colorado now Weak Dem (light blue).

Ohio, North Carolina, Florida, Missouri, and Nevada now barely Dem.

North Dakota now a tie!

West Virginia, Indiana and Montana now barely GOP.

Georgia is Weak GOP!

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL SIGHT!!!

Obama 364 McCain 171 Ties 3

WOO HOO!!!

:woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Montana.... Bearly GOP, North Dakota tied. Sweet.
50 State!

Go Dean

Go Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. 264 "strong" electoral votes
Great way to go into the final 2 weeks - now we need a super push for the landslide.

That $150 million's gonna come in handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If he takes any ONE of the other states, he wins
Seriously, 269 is enough.

McCain has to take them ALL plus take one fo the STRONG DEM states in order to win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, unless that ONE other state is ND
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. 269 + Omaha = 270!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should just go ahead and invent some new states so Obama can win those too.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting tidbit
You really only need 11 states to win the election:
CA, TX, NY, FL, IL, PA, OH, MI, NJ, NC, GA gives you 271

Interesting that Obama's ahead in all but two (GA & TX).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep
And he's making some movement in Georgia, too.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I guess hoping for TX to go blue this year
might be a bit too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Could happen
If the pollster models are way off, you bet it could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama losing in FL & OH
WTF???

If he can't lead in those polls leading up to the election, he has no chance once the shenanigans start there during election day :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. WTF are you talking about?
Both Florida and Ohio show as Barely Dem on that mapo. They are in his column.

On top of that, if Obama wins Virginia, he doesn't NEED EITHER Florida or Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Either Virginia or Colorado
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 09:42 AM by jimlup
Either Virginia or Colorado put Obama over the top. Right now, in a worst case scenario (assuming we hold everything that is now solid blue), he just needs to hold onto VA or CO of the weak dem right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
five_horizons Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. We don't really need FL or OH
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 10:17 AM by five_horizons
In fact I've pretty much accepted that we will probably not win them. I just feel like if it's close, they are going to steal them.

That's OK though. I just don't see any way that we can lose at this point. All we really need are the Kerry states, Iowa and Virginia. And we're comfortably ahead in those all those states, with the exception of maybe VA (up by an average of 6.8 according to RCP). We win those and it's 272-266. And that doesn't include Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico, where we also have pretty good leads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. He doesn't need FL or OH to win.
I would like to see those go Blue, and FL may, but OH is just too screwy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. A. He's Ahead In FL and OH, B. He Doesn't Need Them Anyway
So, WTF are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Thankfully OH is not as important as it was in 2004, given Obama's gains elsewhere
I do not understand what the voters are thinking in OH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. How can Nevada be barely Dem? The state has everything RWers hate!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. But those things bring the one thing RWers love
Money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. I don't understand something
if all the Gore states are solid blue, and Gore won 266 electoral votes, plus NH is now solid blue.....why doesn't the site show 270 strong Democrat instead of 264?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Shifting demographics altered the electoral college
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 10:02 AM by IWantAnyDem
While California had 54 electoral votes in 2000, it had 55 in 2004 and 2008.

Texas had 32 electoral votes in 2000 but has 34 in 2004 and 2008.

Illinois had 22 in 2000, 21 now.

Florida had 25 and has 27 now.

New York had 33 and has 31 now.

This was a result of the 2000 census.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC