Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A quick DU poll to assess the perceptions of our group wrt Palin's 5th child

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: A quick DU poll to assess the perceptions of our group wrt Palin's 5th child
Please vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. You forgot 'It's none of our business' or 'I'm more concerned about her total lack of qualfications"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No. It is our business because this could be a chance to fuck over a political opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Which goes to my suggested option #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm not interested in those options.
What I'm interested in finding is DU's take on the question and we either roll with her story, or we doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I say we ignore her story altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I say, if you want to ignore the story go ahead and leave those of us who don't want to...
ignore it to discuss it in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Hey, you posted the poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Do you argue at the polling places when you vote in an election?
Look out for tasers, bro.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. I like the option for a write in, and most elections have them...
What you're doing there is called a 'take away close', or, at best, a false dichotomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. I disagree. If this story is true and that baby is indeed
her daughter's, it is a slap in the face to things that that horrible woman stands for. Abstinence Only Education and No birth control. period. even between married couples.

Additionally, if it IS true, then she's a liar. Her story about getting on the plane with leaking amniotic fluid is a lie.

And, personally, for me, I have counseled many pregnant teenagers and this kind of subterfuge will wreak havoc as the teenaged mom ages. That might not have been the case many years ago when we sent girls away to visit Aunt Flo for eight months, but nowadays, people are far more accepting of young girls who get pregnant before marriage.

I think either way, it speaks volumes about the character of Ms. Palin.


But, I still luvs you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for doing this poll - I think her honesty or lack thereof

is VERY important. It's the trolls who are trying to act as if we have no right to discuss it or it's
"beneath" us. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You said the same thing about Clinton in 98, right?
Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. If I had been a republican, I sure as hell would have doubted the judgement of those...
within the republican party who would say "let's not look into this, I don't think we can any mileage out of it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I wasn't talking to you, but that's about the saddest statement I've heard today
You're in favor of instigating a Constitutional crisis to make a political point. Yay you.

Never mind that the whole thing blew up in the GOP's faces. Clinton sailed throught the whole thing with 60+% approval ratings...because people thought it was bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. While the Republicans did overplay their hand in impeachment...
1998-2006 have been happy years for them. They made bill a lame duck for the final 2 years of his presidency, they made a lot of our leaders look like fools for believing Clinton, and then there are questions about whether 2000 would have been theirs without the scandal's aftermath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. As a Democrat, I was disgusted with Clinton & his behavior.

And said so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thank you
You're consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Clinton damaged his own reputation by lying.
He should have either refused to talk about it, or bitten the bullet and say 'OK, ya got me'. Republicans made far too much of it, Clinton made it easy for them or run around yelping 'Oh noes'. Dissembling was a foolish thing to do, as we learned to our cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. My vote is that the point is not whose child it is or whose version is
believed, but rather that if the child's mother / grandmother LOSES the 2008 election, it is much more likely that that child will grow up in a nation of more welcoming and inclusive protections than would have been the case if his mother / grandmother WINS the 2008 election.

Go, Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Absolutely, Old Crusoe. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's it, I've had it
Like I usually do when DU gets distracted by some bullshit shiny thingy, I'm going to have to start using the ignore button.

Wake me up when this thing is over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. What is wrong with letting a couple of people check into it?
What if it's true? I personally am not caught up in this story but I do hope a handful of people are looking into this to see if something did go on. There are only a handful of threads on the subject. Let them run their course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. this story is stupid and will backfire on us...
she was a monumentally idiotic choice, McCain really stepped in shit this time- don't make her a sympathetic figure by going there. I think it's in the bag, for us, if we don't fuck it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. "doubt her story" could mean anything from "exaggerated b/c she's a drama queen" to "pulled a Bree"
Personally, I'm with the poster from AK (CampDem?) who posted the theory that she wasn't leaking fluid in Texas but added that to the story for dramatic effect. She probably started contractions on the plane.

"Doubt her story" does not necessarily mean that she created an elaborate hoax.

Did she tell anyone in Houston that she was leaving because of the fluid or did she just tell a reporter after the baby was born? If it is the former, I think somebody should ask her why she did such a reckless thing. It doesn't show good judgment.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well yeah. That's why investigation is necessary. And hushing people for asking questions is no...
way to get to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. I agree. But I think the place to start asking questions is "why didn't you go to a hospital?"
rather than "did you fake your pregnancy to cover up for your daughter." Jumping to the far-fetched is the quickest way to make people dismiss the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obamican Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't beleive her story at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Her story is good enough for me
She could have fudged some minor details, but I am 99% sure it is her child.

Lets keep the debate in reality. There are so many more things we can criticize her for, and John McCain for picking her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. When are you going to post photos of her daughter's shredded hymen?
It may help fuck over a political opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. I doubt her story but don't give a shit
As many character flaws Palin has, this would not be one of them in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. How about: "I don't care."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Demonic Beasts?

Wow, some people REALLY want this discussion to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sisaruus Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. We are sick.
IF (big IF) it turns out to be true, do you really think our attacks will be perceived as being solely directed at her. There are two minor children who are (already) the collateral damage on this warfare on the Palin wombs. How do we come out looking like the good guys on this? IF it's true, she protected her teenage daughter and didn't abandon a grandchild with disabilities. She's going to look like the mother-of-the-century. We on the other hand are simply being evil.

This woman should not be VP for any number of legitimate reasons. And we can't get past an obsession with her uterus. We are sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Until she made it a public issue I could have cared less
But she was the one that used it to bolster her credentuals.... and if she lied then she is no different than clinton who told us that he did not have sex with that woman.
It is not about the baby or the children, it is about lies and deception which is dangerous in a VP or a president that has a finger on a button that could destroy all life on earth.
Just because she is a women with the ability to have a baby does not make her untouchable in politics. Hillery certainly was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. So you are a demonic beast too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Us demonic beasts just LUVZ us some pizza, too, I smell some now,
just in time for lunch in my time zone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. Will DU's opinion make it any more or less true?
No. It makes us look like idiots who are too stupid to focus on real issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I wanted to see if the naysayers are just an overly loud minority on this board.
it turns out they are. The mob has spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It's a fucking ridiculous poll.
It's not about "believing" the story, it's about leaving it the fuck alone. The tabloids will be all over it, we should focus on the FUCKING ISSUES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. You go focus on another issue.
Leave this slime-mongering to those of us who want to do it. This fighting is a waste of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. Makes more sense they were both pregnant and Sarah had a late-term abortion.
It makes much more sense to me that both the Palin women were pregnant.

Sarahs pregnancy was going poorly, child was showing signs of not developing properly. Being in politicial bind (obviously she cant have an abortion) - she elects to go forward with the pregnancy.

At the same time - the daughter is pregnant and kept out of school to hide the pregnancy.

Sarahs pregnancy goes from bad to worse.

When Bristol goes into labor, Sarah flies home to "give birth" and has late term abortion instead.

This provides the political motivation to cover this up -

The fake pregnancy thing is not it...no way. Too far fetched.

The scenario I present is a bit more plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Something here is stinky - but I can't buy the fake pregnancy thing...
That is just TOO out there...

So Im positing an alternative scenario...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Oh yeah. Just because we don't buy her version doesn't mean we know what happened
We have to hypothesize and then test the hypothesis with evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Exactly - Im saying she was pregnant for sure...
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 01:41 PM by hexola
The pics are convincing enough...

But not a healthy looking pregnancy...hence my speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. NOMB!
None of my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
44. How about "ignore her baby story"? Or "her baby story is a smoke screen"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. No. One acknowledges either one narrative or the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC