Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this *'s DD-214? If not, how can you tell?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:28 PM
Original message
Is this *'s DD-214? If not, how can you tell?


It's been said here that his DD-214 is fabricated, non-existent, and has a strange SSN#. Everything here seems to be in order. It also shows that he has two awards...is this what Walt's talking about? Or are these something different?

Is this a fake? If so, how can you tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. He doesn't have a DD-214
There was a different form for discharge back then if memory serves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. where did you find it?
I haven't been following this so much but if in fact this is what they were looking for...where did you find it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. glcq.com
It's a gif, so if I give you a link, it'll just put it up again.

glcq.com/docs/discharge_form_gif

Just put the www. in front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. They weren't looking for this.
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 04:03 PM by gcomeau
They already had it. Item 24 is exerpted right in Walt's post on the topic.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=675299&mesg_id=675299

Neither of those is the award in question.

And I doubt it's a fake...

-Grant

EDIT: Oh, and for anyone who wants to browse through those records, here's a good place to start:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm

Lots of fun stuff in there. Dig around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why would he use Havard Business School
as his permanent address? That's really odd.

Hadn't he graduated 6 years earlier?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he had a 6 year obligation, why has he not completed it?
You say everything looks in order but whatever that document is shows Bush was deficient for 7 months of duty, or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think he got out earlier
because the war had ended and he asked to be released from his commitment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You know what else is odd, "Place of Birth"
Surely he could not have been born in Connecticut! Why, isn't he a rootin'-tootin' cowboah? Word is Bush is less ashamed of his service record than his place of birth and wants all birth certificates scrubbed and changed to "Snakebite, Texas". Oh, and 5 years younger 'cause he's a vain little dandy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And it says he's 5'11". I thought his staff swears he's 6'.
Of course, every picture that shows his shoes tells you he's getting an inch or more from the full sole padding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why didn't he sign it?
"NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE"? Of course not, he was AWOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good catch
Not Available?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JLFinch Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. See this side-by-side service comparison chart...
From the DNC website.

http://www.democrats.org/wherewasbush/fullchart.html


See last entry in the table regarding the "Not Available for Signature". They've had this up there for quite some time. In fact, I think it is mentioned on one of the ads (can't remember if it's MoveOn or DNC) running now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's not a lot about this form that adds up, literally
Am I reading this right,

First he put in 53 weeks from May, 1968 thru Nov, 1969

Then he gets credit for 5 more weeks in Feb, 1970

Then he gets credit for 16 more weeks in Jan 197(0)?

There is no credit for any time from 1971 - 1973.

Then they claim he completed 5 years, 4 months and 5 days by the time he is discharged on Oct. 1, 1973. I'd like to learn how they do math?


Second, why he he being discharged from the Texas Tang in 1973, when he had been reassigned years earlier to Alabama. Shouldn't he have gotten his discharge from Alabama at that point.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. May thru September
Looks like he attended Basic Training as An Enlisted Man , graduated from Basic and was taggede to be an Admin Specialist. but then got a Direct Commission in the TANG . He is credited with those three months service in Basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezekiel333 Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Alabama Transfer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. NO! The date is wrong. It's only his 10/73 transfer
into the Air Reserve for the last leg of his military obligation, which ended for good in November 1974. This document is his discharge from the Texas Air National Guard (TANG), not from the military entirely.

The simplest access to ALL KNOWN Bush military records is partly in timeline form at http://www.awolbush.com/kerry-vs-bush.asp What you have is link "ANG22.gif". Note Item 32 ('Remarks') of this TANG discharge certificate says he "has completed 5 years, 4 months, and 5 days" toward a six-year military service obligation. That credit would put the six year point at 5/26/74, a date mentioned in most of Dubya's documents starting from his May 1968 acceptance into TANG.

What we want is an "undeleted DD214" dated November 1974, discharging Dubya from the Air Force Reserve, and summarizing his entire military career, with informative codes characterizing his service. Though Dubya had been discharged from the ANG in October 1973, at that date he still had more than six months to go on a 6-year service commitment. Starting in October 1973, Dubya was no longer in the Air National Guard. He was an Air Force reservist, period.

We know that he was discharged from his final military obligations on November 21 1974 because of the third from last page of http://www.texasturkey.us/backup/bushdd214.pdf . This Reserve Order CB-6892 from the Air Reserve Personnel Center in Denver says, "the above named officer is relieved from assignment and honorably discharged from all appointments in the United States Air Force.

Note that it's dated November 21 1974, SIX MONTHS AFTER his long-scheduled May 26 1974 date. Evidently, HQ extended Dubya's tour as part of punishment for his AWOL starting in May 1972. But the WH has not released the November 1974 DD214 that would explain everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Look At Bottom Left Hand Corner
It is NGB Form 22, from the National Guard. Contrast to John Kerry's DD214, which clearly states DD 214 on the bottom left hand corner:

http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/DD214.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 05:13 PM
Original message
Seems like different forms for different folks
Similar to a DD 214, the NGB Form 22: Report of Separation and Record of Service is issued to a reservist when discharged from the Army national Guard or Air National Guard. The format is the same regardless of which component of the National Guard the reservist served under.


http://mirage.towerauction.net/la/coe_ngb.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, DD214 and NGB-22 Serve Similar Purposes But...
Since Dubya served the last few months in the Air Force Reserve, and not the National Guard, he should have a DD 214 to cover the gap in his service record. The NGB-22 does not cover his entire term of service.

Walter Star covered all this in remarkable detail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Delete - Dupe post
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 05:19 PM by DoYouEverWonder

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Looking at Kerry's 214, it says Silver Star "V"
Which is what that loonie at the Sun Times says nobody gets in the Navy. Can a Navy vet around here clarify that?

I understand it means Valor, but is it just a typo, or a clerical oversight? I also see his Bronze star has a "V" next to it as well.

I'm getting a lot of accusations from some mouth breathers on another forum, who think they found the "smoking gun" in this Sun Times article, and are now saying he never earned his Silver Star...that he...wait for it...is wearing a medal he id not earn. :eyes:

I trust Kerry, and don't need proof for myself, but I would like to bash them with the facts, since that's how these Freeptards breed...they let un-responded to innuendo fester into an un-challenged urban legend... See "Clinton: the only pardoned felon to be President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No "V" Device on Silver Star Because it is Redundant
"Valor" is one of the qualifying requirements for the Silver Star. Therefore the "V" is implicit in the Silver Star rather than explicitly added as a device.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JLFinch Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. A good link to all of the records released on both sides...

http://www.awolbush.com/kerry-vs-bush.asp


This website says that Bush's last DD-214 is missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC