Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Treatment of Cong. Jim Leach's speech captured the problem with the Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:28 AM
Original message
Treatment of Cong. Jim Leach's speech captured the problem with the Media
I happened to be watching PBS, which actually showed Republican James Leach's speech endorsing Barak Obama last night.

In terms of delivery, Leach was a real snoozer. But in terms opf content, he captured the real stakes in tjios election, and he actually put the issues in an intelligent historical analysis of the issues and stakes in this election.

I then tuned to MSNBC thinking that Keith Olbermann might be doing an erudite analysis of the speech. But no, they hadn;t even shown it, and were having the latest round of soap opera about Barak vs. Hillary and whether Michelle would be able to "sell" herself to average Americans....Then I turned to CNN, and the only reference to leach was a dismissive sneer that it was too "academic" for the convention.

Also, while on PBS, I had heard references by mark Shields to the dynamic speech given earlier by jessee Jackson Jr. Huh? I thought. He spoke that night, and I missed it? I had been watching MSNBC most of the evening and hadn't seen or heard anything about that..(To be fair, I did have the TV on ion the backgrond, and was doing otehr things, so maybe they did show him. But I heard or saw no reference to it.)

Then on CNN I heard James Carville snivelling about how the Democrats had blown it, because they hadn't taken it to Bush yet.

All this encapsulated how fucked up the Media is. They are handling the convention the same way they have handled everythiong else.

They prattle on and on and the same one or two accepted subjects of the day, while ignoring the real news and the 3D issues being played out on the convention floor. They avoid all substance, and then whine because there is no substance.

Despite the presence of the snarky david Brooks, PBS does deserve kudos for actually showing us the convention, dull points and all, rather than parading their egos.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Media did exactly what they did in 2004 - ignored Repubs speaking for Kerry while giving Zell Miller
and Ed Koch all the airtime they wanted to kiss Bush's ass. Media IS our enemy every bit as much as BushInc is our enemy. They are partners in the fascist agenda, and Dems need to combat both entities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was a very thoughtful speech and, after a while, our nosiy Dems listened carefully to it
and gave it very strong applause. I watched it on C-Span; I knew the networks would blow it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I liked his pojnts about the evolution of the American Questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Text is here
Edited on Tue Aug-26-08 08:59 AM by BeyondGeography
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/2008-democratic-national-convention-remarks/story.aspx?guid=%7BB3E1CDBD-476F-4066-B590-DF651622FE3D%7D&dist=hppr

In a more civilized country, the whole election would be about this portion of his speech:

The American progressive tradition reflected in these debates spans Democratic standard bearers from the prairie populist William Jennings Bryan to the Camelot statesman, John F. Kennedy. It includes Republicans like Teddy Roosevelt, who built up the National Parks system and broke down corporate monopolies, and Dwight David Eisenhower, who ran on a pledge to end a war in Korea, brought a stop to European colonial intervention in the Middle East, quietly integrated the Washington, D.C., school system and not so quietly sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock to squash segregation in public schools throughout the country.

In models of international statecraft, progressive leadership includes Al Gore, who helped galvanize worldwide understanding of the most challenging environmental threat currently facing the planet, and our current president's father, who led an internationally sanctioned coalition to oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait.

In Congress, Democratic senators like Pat Moynihan and Mike Mansfield served in Republican administrations. On the Republican side, Arthur Vandenberg helped President Truman launch the Marshall Plan, and Everett Dirksen backed Lyndon Johnson's landmark civil rights legislation.

In troubled times, it was understood that country comes before party, that in perilous moments mutual concern for the national interest must be the only factor in political judgments. This does not mean that debate within and between the political parties should not be vibrant. Yet what frustrates so many citizens is the lack of bipartisanship in Washington and the way today's Republican Party has broken with its conservative heritage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I didn't see the speech, but I read somewhere else that the audience
was kinda rude. That's embarrassing, especially since Leach was a "guest", being a GOPer and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here it is on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6981BGSPnNU&feature=email

I'm TV-free, and have to rely on the internet for my info. I sometimes miss the "immediacy" of events, but overall I think I'm WAAAAY ahead of the game. I can do without those corporate-friendly Talking Rectums.

I'm pretty jaded by now, but I still rate that speech as pretty effective. I doubt that it'll send any Democrats to the McCain camp, but it should bring some Republicans & Independents over to Obama.


pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I was surprised that the cable networks had NO intention of covering
his speech. Gee, they covered batshit Zell's...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sound like the Media is cherry picking the coverage.
Or it could be that they think that they" the news anchors" are more important than the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Just wait for their reaction to Joementum's speech at the RNC
They will all LOVE it. It will be played at least 286 times over the next few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. The only cable news channel we get is CNN.
So, I was, unfortunately, watching their "coverage" last night and was actually enjoying Leach's speech. Suddenly, right in the middle of the speech, they cut away from it and started in with their yammering how he wasn't as effective as when Miller spoke for the GOP, why is he speaking for the other side, will Lieberman be better when he speaks for the GOP, etc., etc., yaddayadda, ad nauseum. I simply couldn't believe it, even for them. Right in the middle of the fucking speech. The arrogance and bias of that was simply incredible. Yet, I'm sure they'll carry ALL of LieberBush's speech and be respectfully silent afterwards. Grrrrrr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC