Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VP announcement will probably be a week before the convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:55 PM
Original message
VP announcement will probably be a week before the convention
from Newsweek:

Obama's campaign had hoped to announce his pick this week to grab the spotlight before the Beijing Olympics. But now a decision is unlikely to come until the week before the party convention, which begins in Denver on Aug. 25. According to party sources close to the selection process, who asked not to be identified discussing an internal matter, progress was slowed by Obama's overseas trip—and because his list is more fluid than generally thought.

(snip)

In fact, Obama aides have identified potential drawbacks to all the front runners. Biden brings foreign-policy expertise, but there are lingering concerns that his garrulous tendencies might knock the campaign off message. Bayh, who the sources say has been lobbying hard for the nod, brings solid centrist credentials. (An aide says Bayh is not "actively" pursuing the job.) But his wife serves on numerous corporate boards, and she also previously worked as a lawyer for drug giant Eli Lilly—an inconvenient link for a party committed to health-care reform. Kaine is seen as a "change" candidate, but he has no national-security experience. Clinton remains a possibility, but her chances are seen as remote, if only because of the near impossibility of vetting her husband's business affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. "vetting her husband's business affairs."
Not to mention his inability to control his tongue. (Preemptively, just because I said that does not mean I hate Bill or Hillary--I don't. Not liking what they say or do does not mean I hate them, which should not be a difficult concept, but is for some.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The aids aren't saying this about any of the folks mentioned.....
Newsweek reporter is. :rofl:

btw, Could you provide a link? thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's almost always junior staffers that give vague complains and always anonymously
I do understand the temptation to talk to the press when you're a low level staffer and don't have much power. But if I were going to do it, I would at least attempt to spin the message in a positive manner for the people I work for, not blow off steam. But more likely I wouldn't make anonymous unauthorized comments to the press at all because those who keep their mouths shut are the ones that advance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. From my understanding the VP vetting process is sequestered away
from the rest of the campaign.

I think that Newsweek makes shit up when it is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or the junior staffer gives a half story
For example, lets say that I worked for a Senator and I know for a fact that my Senator had a conversation with Caroline Kennedy. I also know that Caroline Kennedy and the Senator are personal friends and that the conversation had nothing to do with Obama's VP search.

But if I simply told Newsweek that the Senator was speaking to Caroline Kennedy and I was unsure why, they would write a story about it. If not Newsweek then certainly Politico would do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Here is the link. Sorry about that
http://www.newsweek.com/id/150485

As for vetting a husband, just as it was with Geraldine Ferraro, and will probably occur with any married woman candidate. In most cases - Pelosi, Feinstein - it is the husband who made a killing in real estate, for example, and the wife who, after raising the kids, decided to go into politics. So, yes, the husband's business deals get a close scrutiny.

McCain, of course, is the exception and there are already questions how Cindy's empire be handled if - gasp - he wins. Since the beer business is not like stocks and bonds that can be put in a blind trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC