I don't neccesarily think this means anything...if Clinton even IS being formally considered, Howard would be best to just keep his mouth shut about. Though I can definitely believe also that she may not be at the top of the list. This article doesn't really have anything new, but I'm just posting it since its Howard's Fox debut, and I'm sure Politico would have made an article about it if he had said something more along the lines of what James Carville said on Anderson Cooper last night (that "the children in the Obama campaign are playing with matches").
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0708/Wolfson_Clinton_not_being_vetted.htmlWolfson: Clinton not being vetted 'as far as I know'
On Fox, former Clinton chief strategist Howard Wolfson indicated that Hillary Clinton is not being formally considered as Obama's running mate, in that she has not been asked to undergo the formal vetting process.
"Not as far as I know," said Wolfson, who remains close to Clinton, in response to a question from Sean Hannity.
He continued to say that the lack of formal vetting wouldn't necessarily rule out the possibility that Obama would choose her.
"There is more information available about Hillary in the public record than just about any other public figure in America," he says, citing in particular the tax returns that Obama's campaign demanded she release.
"That may be sufficient for him to make whatever decision he wants to make," said Wolfson, a newly-minted Fox contributor.
Wolfson's words, along with Obama's so far anemic fundraising on Clinton's behalf, seemed to indicate Clinton's willingness to stand apart from Obama -- as a separate power center within the party if he wins, and as an instant rival for the next nomination if he loses.
But he suggested she'd clearly also like to be Obama's running mate.
"I think she'd be a huge asset to the ticket. I think she'd be a great addition," he said