Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain fundraiser sued by partner in lucrative contract with U.S. military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:11 AM
Original message
McCain fundraiser sued by partner in lucrative contract with U.S. military
Editor's note: NBC News has learned that this story has sparked a congressional investigation. Click here to read more.

A little-noticed civil lawsuit in Florida is shining a light on an unusual but hugely profitable Pentagon contract to ship millions of gallons of aviation fuel to U.S. bases in Iraq through the kingdom of Jordan.

The deal involves a cast of influential characters, including the king of Jordan’s brother-in-law, who is suing Harry Sargeant III, a top Florida-based fundraiser for Sen. John McCain's presidential bid.

Sargeant is a Florida businessman and former Marine Corps pilot hailed by the McCain campaign as a "Trailblazer" for raising $100,000 or more in political donations. Through a company called International Oil Trading Co., or IOTC, Sargeant and a partner have a lucrative contract worth hundreds of millions of dollars per year to supply American military forces in Iraq with fuel, especially aviation fuel. The firm ships the fuel to Jordan and then trucks it across the border, where U.S. forces escort the convoys to air bases.

Sargeant’s IOTC has experienced phenomenal growth since the Iraq war started, transforming itself from an unknown business in 2004 to a major Pentagon contractor in only a few years.

The way the American military structured the deal, only a company with the blessing of the Jordanian government could win the contract. A bidder was required to have a Jordanian government "Letter of Authorization," and only IOTC received such a letter.

The lawsuit against Sargeant was filed April 10 in Florida state court by Mohammad Al-Saleh, who is married to the half sister of King Abdullah of Jordan. Al-Saleh’s suit says he essentially brokered Sargeant's contract by arranging the approval and cooperation of the Jordanian government, using his "connections and influence." The lawsuit alleges that Al-Saleh arranged for the Jordanian government “to issue a letter of authorization to IOTC.” Al-Saleh’s lawyer, Jonathan Frank, said, “Were it not for my client, they would not have been able to get that letter.”

‘Whoever got the letter got the contract’
"Without the letter, you can't bid," Al-Saleh said in an interview with NBC News. "Whoever got the letter got the contract."

Al-Saleh says he also arranged a deal with a company owned by the Jordanian Army which ensured that oil could be offloaded at a Jordanian port "without interference, bureaucratic or otherwise." So in essence a Jordanian Army-owned company was operating as a subcontractor in the IOTC deal.

A representative of IOTC, speaking on condition of anonymity because the company has not yet responded to the lawsuit in court, denied Al-Saleh’s contentions. “He did not arrange that deal with the Jordanian military,” the representative said. The IOTC representative also said Al-Saleh was not the key figure in obtaining the letters of authorization which were so crucial. The IOTC representative acknowledged that Al-Saleh played a role in obtaining one of the letters of authorization.

Jordan is a close U.S. ally in the Middle East. Although Jordan is not an oil-producing country, unlike other neighbors of Iraq such as Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, the Pentagon had insisted that fuel be brought in through Jordan.

IOTC has won three successive contracts to perform the work. The company — a partnership between Sargeant, Al-Saleh and a third man — first won the Pentagon Iraq fuel contract in 2004 with another company. When the Pentagon put the contract up for competition in 2005, IOTC, now incorporated in Florida, won with a bid of $213 million, even though other companies offered lower bids. The Defense Energy Support Center, or DESC, which awarded the contract, said in a statement to NBC News that none of those lower bidders met contract requirements.

Then, in 2007, when the Defense Department put the contract up for bid again, IOTC won again.

Continued>>>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24846474/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am sure this is only one of many such stories that can be told.
Unfortunately, it is FAR too complicated to be turned into the kind of "soundandfury-bite" required to draw the attention of the noise machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, we're shipping petroleum products *to* Iraq?...

Well, isn't that special?

I guess this gives McCain ammunition for his argument against himself that this was not a war to get Iraq's oil. Apparently this is a war to send Iraq oil.

Man. I'm constantly amazed by the invisible subtlety of Bush strategery.

Regarding the lawsuit, I'm still not clear on why that guy is suing... He's the beneficiary and it sounds as if he got exactly what he wanted. Maybe I'm reading it wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If not to get the oil, but to play middleman
and take profit coming and going figuratively and literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC