Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Out of the mouths of babes. Gitmo and my Constitutional Law Class.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renaissance Man Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 09:35 PM
Original message
Out of the mouths of babes. Gitmo and my Constitutional Law Class.
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 09:39 PM by Renaissance Man
Yesterday, I received this e-mail from my Constitutional Law professor concerning a case that we argued (Boumediene v. Bush) in moot court in my Con Law class. Needless to say, our (what I assume to be liberal) Constitutional Law professor was proud of his class.

Indeed, we are the ones that we have been waiting for.

Greetings again, Ladies and Gentlemen:

Thanks to all of you who’ve emailed me about the momentous Boumediene v. Bush decision that was handed down today by our U.S. Supreme Court. As we discussed in class last fall, the swing vote in the 5 - 4 decision was indeed Justice Anthony Kennedy, who authored the majority opinion, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito in dissent. There are also concurring and dissenting opinions.

You can read the NY Times article on the case at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/washington/12cnd-gitmo.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

The actual slip opinion is here or available from the NY Times article if this link doesn’t work:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/06-1195.pdf

The decision stretches all the way back to Marbury v. Madison to address the separation of powers issues and includes many of the opinions we discussed and you argued about in the Moot Court Exercise as pertinent to deciding the conflict, from US and English courts, on habeas corpus, extraterritoriality, and earlier military tribunals. Reading the NY Times article and the summary at the beginning of the decision will give you a good idea about what is said in the opinions and I strongly encourage each of you to read the entire decision when you have the chance so that you can see how incredibly close your arguments, questions, commentaries, editorials, stories, and opinions came to the real thing.

From my standpoint, having this moment read the NY Times article and the summary, it really just goes to show, once again, what a truly remarkable group of thoughtful, bright, and dedicated students you were!

Hope you’re having a great summer, keep in touch, and let me know how you’re doing.

ATB,

Con Law Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC