Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The FIRST Presidential Ticket With a White Woman and a Black Man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:05 PM
Original message
The FIRST Presidential Ticket With a White Woman and a Black Man
Edited on Sat Jun-07-08 05:06 PM by IWantAnyDem


No, not Obama/Clinton 2008.

Woodhull/Douglass 1872 was the FIRST PResidential ticket with a white woman and a black man. They ran on the Equal Rights Party ticket. That's Victoria Woodhull and Frederick Douglass. We've come a loooong way in 136 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Running for president but neither could vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Douglass could vote. Woodhull coudn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah. People forget that AA men had the vote before women. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But a white woman ran for president before any black man.
Weirdness abounds in this strange nation of ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. In theory; tell us how that worked out in practice.
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 06:20 AM by Spider Jerusalem
How many white women were lynched for voting? Or had to pay poll taxes? Pass literacy tests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. In practice, it took 92 years
to begin to throw off the intimidation via viloence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Limpballs is telling people that every day.
Coming soon to a batshit-crazy hate e-mail account near you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. How did that work out for the politics of that day?
Did they get death threats too? Or raise consciousness or awareness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, no death threats
There's no record of whether or not there were any votes cast for the ticket. Douglass didn't even acknowledge the nomination for the vice presidency and served as an elector from the state of New York that year. Teh two major candidates were Ulysses S. Grant, Republican (whom Douglass endorsed and was an elector for), and Horace Greeley, Liberal Republican. The Democrats nominated Greeley, too. Woodhull was ineligible to be president had she been elected. She turned 35 years old nearly six months after Grant was inaugurated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. she was involved in a trial equalling that of OJ Simpson in terms of public interest
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Woodhull


On May 14, 1870, she and Tennessee established a paper, (with money made from her brokerage days), Woodhull & Claflin's Weekly, which stayed in publication for the next six years, and became notorious for publishing controversial opinions on taboo topics (especially with regard to sex education and free love). The paper advocated, among other things, women's suffrage, short skirts, spiritualism, free love, vegetarianism, and licensed prostitution. It's commonly stated that the paper also advocated birth control, but some historians disagree. The paper is now known primarily for printing the first English version of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto in its December 30, 1871 edition.

The Weekly broke an important story in 1872 that set off a national scandal that preoccupied much of the public for months. One of the most renowned ministers of the day, Henry Ward Beecher, had condemned Woodhull's free love philosophy in his sermons. But a member of his church, Theodore Tilton, disclosed to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, a colleague of Woodhull, that his wife confessed to him that Beecher was committing adultery with her, and this hypocrisy provoked Woodhull to expose Beecher. Ultimately Beecher stood trial for adultery in an 1875 legal proceeding that equalled, if not exceeded, the sensationalism of the O.J. Simpson trial a century later, holding the attention of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

George Francis Train once defended her. Other feminists of her time, including Susan B. Anthony, disagreed with her tactics in pushing for women's equality. Some characterized her as opportunistic and unpredictable: in one notable incident, she had a run in with Anthony during a meeting of the NWSA. (The radical NWSA later merged with the conservative AWSA to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. There were a few free love communes in the nineteenth century
before the Civil War, at least one in upstate New York (Oneida?), if memory serves. Sojourner Truth was involved with one, but as a servant, not a participant, I believe. I had to write an original historical paper for my high school senior social studies class back in 1968. I wrote about Sojourner Truth and read all the available documents at the time (helps to live next to one of the largest university libraries in the nation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Beecher, no longer a minister, later started his own business
... a slaughterhouse. It became known as "Beecher Meats" ...

:sarcasm:

Very interesting, gc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SparkyMac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. And 48 years later -- white women got the vote

Is that a sign of future progress ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. And 92 years later, black men actually were able to exercise their franchise
Voting Rights act of 1964 and all that.

That's how things progress in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Black men AND black women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. True that!
White women were able to exercise the franchise openly before black women, without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's interesting.
Wasn't Frederick Douglass also biracial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Probably not from a positive relationship n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC