Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The very fact that Sen. Clinton is attempting to bully her way onto the ticket,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:22 PM
Original message
The very fact that Sen. Clinton is attempting to bully her way onto the ticket,
despite being denied by Obama himself, is exactly why she cannot be the Vice President. The last thing that a successful White House needs is a VP constantly trying to go over the President's head. Add a loudmouthed glory-hog ex-President to the mix, and a Obama/Clinton ticket, even if successful in November, is certain to be unsuccessful from January onwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Back in the early days of our Republic's history, the VP slot was given to 2nd place in the GE
THAT didn't work, for exactly the reasons one would guess, and it was changed.

We do not need to go back to a method which has already been shown to be faulty in the extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The counterargument to that, of course, is Kennedy/Johnson and Reagan/Bush. The
difference, of course, is that both Johnson and Bush were able to defer to Kennedy and Reagan, while Clinton has not shown the remotest ability to do so. Had she run a different campaign, things may have turned out differently for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not sure about that
Edited on Thu May-22-08 04:38 PM by nichomachus
There is a lot of evidence that Johnson was working against Kennedy -- some even connect him to the assassination -- and that Bush and his fascists were running their own operation while the brain-damaged Reagan dozed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That is quite true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. And some people connect the Bushies to the Hinckley assassination
The Bush Sr's were eating dinner with Hinckley's parents when the Reagan assassination attempt occurred
(or so the story is told)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not quite
I think Neil Bush was supposed to dine with Hinckley's brother that evening -- and didn't. However, there were other connections between the Bushes and the Hinckleys.

There is also overwhelming evidence -- from the analysis of the tape of the incident -- that the shot that hit Reagan could not have been fired by Hinckley. Most likely Hinckley was just a patsy recruited by the people planning the hit, but even he believes he was the one who did it. Sort of like Sirhan Sirhan.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Please keep the tinfoil content on the low side of the scale.
I'd prefer this not go to the Dungeon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. Tinfoil? Screw you. These are facts and I'm sorry if they're inconvenient to you
I'm tired of bullshit artists pegging everything they can't deal with as tinfoil. Go fuck yourself -- please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. No. There are no facts posted. There is baseless opinion, founded on amateur analysis
of coincidences--that is to say, tinfoil. It really wouldn't change my life in the slightest if LBJ personally strangled JFK or if Reagan was gunned down by Martians and replaced with a robot; claims of "inability to handle the truth" are one of the more tiresome tinfoil strategies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. And then there are those
who come on web sites and screech and holler to support the "official and approved" government story on everything. These are the wacky "coincidence theorists" who want us to believe that the most incredible series of events just happens to occur by coincidence.

What they ask us to believe is like asking us to imagine that you could dump a bucket of golf balls down a marble staircase and have every ball line up on the fourth step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree.
Edited on Thu May-22-08 04:44 PM by yellerpup
K&R :kick: This is a new tack for me, too. After PA I thought it was still possible, but now I'm just exhausted and angry. He can do better and we citizens deserve better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent point
I could see her going against him every step of the way and why not? She has gone against him during this entire process, why would things change? She said she is best for the job. Her determination to kill the party unless she wins tells me that she cannot be trusted as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:57 PM
Original message
The argument against her really does write itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Same to you, fella. Obama won't win anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ...
Edited on Thu May-22-08 04:59 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well.....he's already won one thing
VICTORY

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. But bu-uht
Victory no longer counts. It is LOSING that counts.

She's lost the primaries, and the delegates, and she only claims to have won the popular vote,
so it is now on to the WH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymakeragain Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. How's your McSame vote sitting in your gut?
I bet not so good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. Will you vote for Obama in November? That's all I want to know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. What? A new MSM talking point... meme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. How did that rezko trial work out for you indimuse?
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Shockingly, it turns out that those of us who follow IL politics were right
that this would be confined to Blagojevich's circle, and those who didn't know a fucking thing but mouthed off about "Obama's ties to Rezko" were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. ...yes. The new Clinton talking point is that she can force her way onto the ticket,
despite the wishes of the Democratic nominee. It is strongly implied that she is threatening to tear the party in two if she is not given what she wants. I think any reasonable person would call that "bullying."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I have a new meme for you Indimuse...guess who's in court tomorrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. LQQK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. REZKO CLINTON!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here's a BULLY Tactic! BO's Atty CRASHES Hillary's conference call! WTF??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks for the totally off-topic kicks! What exactly does this have to do with the VP choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. This whole Hillary losing thing is WAY under your skin, isn't it?
You sound positively unhinged. Your posts have literally stopped making any kind of sense.

Maybe you oughta log off and take a walk or something. You're gonna give yourself an aneurysm.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. Your assumption that obama will win without her does not bear
fruit.

The best play of the day was WJC when he began putting out the word that if hrc does not win the NOMINATION, she would be inclined to be seated as the VP on the ticket. Now that is good news. WHY? Because it just about quarantees the hrc supporters will stay with obama and clinton......Now, if for some reason the word gets out that obama does not want hrc as his vp, then those same hrc supporters that would stand with that ticket will bail on obama and more then the usual 35 to 42% will either vote for McCain are stay home in protest.....So, whatever way this shakes out WJC jsut checked and maybe mated obama....uh huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. You're just as wrong as you were when you said she'd win the nomination over and again,
and just as wrong as when you said Obama would lose 19 of 21 Super Tuesday states. Clinton supporters might feel like holding their breath for months now, but that's about as realistic as when any five-year-old says it. Back in reality, Clinton supporters are moving towards Obama day by day, and his polling numbers in the party and against McCain are already on the rise. By the convention, it'll be as if she had never run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. You sound like a child.
Voting McSame is sell destructive and petulant. You aren't going to convince me large amounts of Hillary's supporters are that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. And you're almost as wrong as all of your racist posts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. The very fact that Sen. Clinton is attempting to bully her way onto the ticket,
Edited on Thu May-22-08 06:23 PM by Tatiana
shows that she believes Obama will be a winner.

She'd never attach herself to a losing ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. Agreed. Even if she didn't have that windbag, blow hard husband, she's unacceptable.
The last thing a president can have is a VP who is undermining. That is plain nuts, and Hillary is a psycho with serious emotional problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. Latest polls show Hillary's negatives among voters is UP to 53%
recognizing that one fourth of her "reagan democratic" voters never vote for a democrat anyway, in states that don't vote for democrats, she would no doubt be a huuuuge drag on a ticket.

and I don't want to go too far down the rabbit hole, but four days after Kennedy was assassinated, Johnson changed U.S. policy toward Vietnam. In Aug. of 1964, just months before his election, he created the false flag "gulf of tonkin" provocation to justify the horror that was Vietnam.

Kennedy, of course, wanted to tighten up the oil lease pork and open peace talks with the USSR. Robt. Kennedy was investigating the mafia, an organization that didn't exist according to J. Edgar Hoover, a cross-dressing homosexual who, according to a Frontline documentary, was blackmailed by the mob b/c they had a picture of him giving his boyfriend a blow job.

It's always dangerous to go up against the powers-that-be and equally dangerous to have one of their in-pocket pols as the person who takes over in the event of your death.

Not that that has anything to do with Hillary, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
36. She is the one that compared it to a job interview -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. Why do you guys believe every rumor
you hear, as long as it's negative about clinton? And then you reject every rumor that's negative about Obama.

It just doesnt make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
38. Bully? Who sez she is "bullying" her way onto the ticket? Got any quotes of her saying so? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC