Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Rates Slim Edge Over Obama in PA District Delegate Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:25 AM
Original message
Clinton Rates Slim Edge Over Obama in PA District Delegate Race
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002703375&cpage=1

Really Interesting article for Delegate wonks

The key to the Delegate math is whether newly registered voteres turn out in large numbers for Obama in the Philly suburbs. He pruportedly registereed abou 200,000 statewide. If they turrnout for him in record numbers and the overall turn out is 2,000,000 that amount yo about 10% of the pie.

If he can score a couple of extra District level delegates there and hold Clinton to a 5% margin in the statewide vote. This could end up nearly tied in the delgate count.

'AS is always the case. Turnout is king, but realy it is where the turnout is.


April 15, 2008 – 12:13 a.m.
Clinton Rates Slim Edge Over Obama in PA District Delegate Race

By Greg Giroux and Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff
Is Barack Obama trailing Hillary Rodham Clinton in Pennsylvania by double digit percentages? Or has he closed the gap to single digits, as recent polls suggest? Could he even win the April 22 primary — a shocking upset that probably would force Clinton to the sidelines? These are among the questions that have the hearts of the punditocracy atwitter in the run-up to the first Democratic presidential balloting in six weeks.

We at CQ Politics are pondering those too. But we look ahead to next week’s vote in Pennsylvania a bit differently: How many delegates might each candidate win in Pennsylvania, which is the most populous of the states and territories that have yet to vote?

That answer will be mainly determined not by the sum of the votes Clinton and Obama win in Pennsylvania, but rather by the state’s parts. Pennsylvania will send 187 Democratic delegates to the party’s national convention in Denver this August, and most of them — 103 to be exact — will be allocated according to the votes the candidates receive in each of the state’s 19 congressional districts.

And a CQ Politics analysis of the political circumstances in Pennsylvania’s congressional districts, detailed below, projects an edge to Clinton — but by just 53 district-level delegates to 50 for Obama under the Democratic Party’s proportional distribution rules.

These numbers suggest that Clinton, even with a victory in Pennsylvania, would make only a small incremental gain against Obama’s overall lead in the delegate race.

Of the state’s remaining 84 slots, only 55 pledged delegates will be distributed based on the statewide popular vote, with the state’s remaining 29 seats going to unpledged “superdelegates.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've Been Saying That For Weeks...
She'll get a minimal delegate pickup, if any, in PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. if she doesn't win by 20 points, she's toast
she'll need to win the rest of the states by 28 point margins just to tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. which will then be negated by NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. that assumes EVERYONE he registered votes for him which is HIGHLY unlikely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree and I was actually factoring that in
Edited on Tue Apr-15-08 11:43 AM by Perky
There is little doubt that they targeted commu nities where there was a high pwobablulity that a) they would actuallly vote and b0 they would vote for Obama.

I would suspect that that translates in to something like 110-120,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC