Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

STOP IT!! You can't just "call" the race. There's no nominee. No one can get to 2025 WITHOUT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:39 PM
Original message
STOP IT!! You can't just "call" the race. There's no nominee. No one can get to 2025 WITHOUT
super-delegates. More people get to - and WANT to - vote. Why not let them???

Is Obama a WITCH because he wants to win - and plays dirty politics to do it??? Is he a power-hungry maniac???

Stop this CHILDISHNESS!! Quit whining and bitching and moaning and bullying.

Let's see where this goes. PLAY BALL!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're just not very bright, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. What you said.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pelosi number 220
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. So it's no longer sexist to use Whining & Bitching?
Because if that's the case... I have a few things I'd like to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. Toufreakin'che! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
52. Word!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's over when one candidate can no longer win. That's happened.
Since it's been declared by all the high-ranking Dems that there will be no overturning of the popular election results, the race is effectively over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. ONE is saying it. Doesnt make it so. NEITHER SIDE HAS THE DELEGATES. Or will have them.
It's really simple. I'm praying for a deadlocked convention - which looks likely. Ain't democracy grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. I'm also holding out for a deadlocked convention.
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 04:09 PM by LWolf
One that will result in a better nominee than either.

I'm actually willing to vote for one of the two entirely unacceptable candidates in my late primary to try to help that process along; whichever candidate is slightly behind at the time.

I'm told all the time by sincere, passionate DUers that my vote is a strategic thing, not a personal choice. That I shouldn't withhold it just because I don't like the candidates.

So I won't. I'll vote in a strategic way to lend weight to the only winning strategy for me: a dead-locked convention and a DIFFERENT candidate.

What other possible point is there to a late, after-the-party's over primary? If the early states get to unacceptably narrow our choices down, the late states can play spoiler.

Until the party decides to provide a truly democratic primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. You want a convention that will damage our chances in November?
Whose side are you on, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
48. The Real Magic Number is 1,627
The Real Magic Number is 1,627
1,627 is fifty percent plus one of the 3,253 democratically selected delegates to the Democratic nominating convention.

Once a candidate has 1,627 of these "pledged" delegates, he or she will win the nomination -- unless the 796 superdelegates overturn the judgment of voters.

And that's not going to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Aaargh - you support dirty politics now????
What the fuck is wrong with some of you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. No, I don't - I'm an Edwards supporter. But Obama has run a vicious campaign.
The denial of it by his supporters is showing a real blindness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Oh bullshit
I am so fed up with this. Look, a lot of you Edwards supporters went after Obama because he looked like the easier target earlier. Some of you believed your own campaign propaganda. It is time to let it go. It is not Obama's fault that Edwards didn't make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
54. They seem to forget that... it was Hillary...
who sent out fake mailers that attacked Obama and implied that they were from Edwards. Do you remember that from Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Seems a lot of Hillary supporters are claiming they are Edwards supporters lately.
Many posts that trashes Obama or enshrines Hillary have an Edwards avatar. Seems to be the 'in thing' lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Edwards supporter since 03. Why must you people try to denigrate anyone who is not under the sway?
Some of us want to see this play out. Till the end. No need to call it early. Simple as that. You need not attempt to insult me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #39
49. Because it's the nature of Obamanoids to be Obamannoying. n/t
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrdlu Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Very true...
I didn't want to believe it...Still don't...But then I saw him standing smug as a bug by the loopy General McPeak while that worthy accused Bill Clinton of McCarthyism. The general must have pulled too many G's too many times while flying with the Thunderbirds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary has already lost
Like a chicken without its head, the body just doesnt know its dead yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. What is your realistic scenario for Hillary winning the nomination?
I'll give you mine for Obama:

Obama wins the pledged delegates
Obama wins the recorded vote
Obama wins the most primaries
Obama wins the most caucuses

30% of the remaining super delegates follow current S.D. polling and decide to respect the will of the voters. Q.E.D.


Your turn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. My guess is, the two will be essentially deadlocked going into the convention. No one with ENOUGH.
One or the other may have MORE - but neither, ENOUGH. Al Gore might be a compromise candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's just an uninformed guess on your part
If you haven't bothered to look at the real math, you have no business hectoring people who have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I didn't see anything but fuzzy math in your post. BHO will NOT have 2025.
Let's let the voters of PA, NC and IN have their say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You can't even post at the level of detail I did.
I can give you more math if you want, but you can't even sketch out a winning scenario for her.

It's OVER. She cannot win. I've shown you why. Now if you want to continue the discussion, you need to come up with something more than conjecture and exclamation points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. She can win by the same means as Obama - superdelegates. It's going to be a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. No, she can't.
My hypothesis is that all the Clinton supporters have is fantasy and wishful thinking. So far, you're proving that quite well.

Let's try this once again:

Obama is going to win the pledged delegate count.
Obama is going to win the recorded vote. (meaningless, but we'll play on your turf)
Obama will have the most primaries won
Obama will have the most caucuses won

The BEST estimates have Hillary needing 65-70% of the uncommitted superdelegates in order to TIE Obama. How, exactly, do you see that happening (barring an underage gay sex hooker scandal)??

Especially given the fact that Hillary has not gained a single superD since Feb 5th, while Obama has gained over 60.


How do you address this? How do you see her overcoming what I've outlined above?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Al Gore is not running.
And this will never go all the way to the convention. Hillary will be long gone by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. You are now defending a liar...
Is this what it has come too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Obama's a liar too. Good grief - Rezco, Rev Wright. Get REAL. They both lie.
They're both politicians. I'd pick another candidate quite frankly. Hello deadlocked convention!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Prove it....
How has Obama lied about Rezko?

How has Obama lied about Wright?

Hillary was shown, proven to be a liar, no ands, ifs or buts. Pictures do not lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_nanny Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Here's the article that many are pointing to
I really don't give a fuck anymore. They both lie. Everyone in politics lies. Our party is so fucked and I blame it on all of us. I'm for the "Greenspan Amendment" (even though I can't stand Greenspan) that proposed, "Anyone who is willing to do what it takes to be elected president is immediately disqualified from holding the office of president."

Anywhoo, here's the quote and the link about the Wright stuff. (pun not intended but I made myself lol anyway ;-)


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&oref=login&oref=slogin

Mr. Wright, who has long prided himself on criticizing the establishment, said he knew that he may not play well in Mr. Obama’s audition for the ultimate establishment job.

“If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me,” Mr. Wright said with a shrug. “I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. What did Obama lie about--point to where ANY statement he made
about either Rezko or Wright was a PROVEN lie? I refuse to let Hillbots spread this meme unchallenged--it's Hillary who is the known and proven liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. This will never get to the convention.
It will be decided by the SD much sooner.
They know the party is being torn apart by Hillary's unwillingness to acknowledge defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. The only children in this thing are Hillary and her supporters who can't get their way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sigh. LET IT SINK please (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. *plonk*
This is yet another asshole stirring the shit.

Kiss goodbye to your audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clevbot Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. DNC doesn't see your way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Screw more terrorism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. But one candidate can only get to 2025 by strong-arming the SDs.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. LOL
If Clinton wasn't able to "strong arm" SD's to support her when everyone figured she was going to be the next President of the United States last Summer, or after she won New Hampshire, or California, who on earth can strong arm them into doing anything now that they themselves don't believe makes sense? The SD's who had alliegences already endorsed some one. The SD's who owed political favors already endorsed someone. What are left are uncommitted SD's, and it's not exactly as if there is some big bad party machine that Clinton controls that can force them to do her bidding. What is she going to do, get Nancy Pelosi to lean on them for her?

SD's will only support Clinton now if they see some compelling logic why she should be our nominee rather than Obama. She has no ability to strong arm them into anything.

And neither candidate can get to 2025 now without SD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. There's always the Tonya Harding Option.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. Okay
But no complaining when she sets up a command center in the bushes outside the Oval Office in January, in case the President sleeps through a 3am call. She promises she'll be Ready on Day One, and I take her at her word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. strange, isn't it?
this is why Democrats don't win national elections. We beg for candidates willing to pull out all the stops and win, and when we get one, we shiv them for not being the 'right kind of people'

I wonder how Obama would act if he was five points down with two weeks to go? would he fight tooth and nail for us? or simply keep on smiling as the ship slipped beneath the icy waters of the North Atlantic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. What do you expect from Obama supporters?
They thought that Obama would walk away with it, but Clinton spoiled their plans. And, now they act like spoiled babies always crying about how it's unfair to Obama that Clinton is still in the race.

While I don't like Clinton, I have to admire that she is indeed a fighter.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. She can't win a majority of the vote, which is what the superdelegates should follow ()
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. the vote? Or the pledged delegates?
I can't keep the goalposts straight. Superdelegates should do what they are supposed to: vote for the person they think will be a better representative of the democratic party in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. But Super Delegates won't over turn the Pledged Delegates, and Obama has won that already
It is over. Sorry your candidate lost. Better luck next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. I'm not going to sit here an indulge Hillary's ego. The race is OVER and its time to focus on McSame
Its really as simple as that. Fuck your play ball, fuck your desire to let Hillary lose for the next few months. I want to win the whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. and you really think that three extra months of free media
is going to hurt Barack Obama's chances in the Fall? who's paying attention to John McCain? oh right, no one, because the race is over. you think Obama's race speech gets covered for free on every tv station if the race is over? you think anyone pays any attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. Obama is indeed the nominee, though...
...unless you want SD's to override the pledged delegates, and that would only cause war at the convention and a "President McCain".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
50. Yep. I can't figure out why anyone is afraid to just let the voters, well, vote.
Oh, wait. I CAN think of a reason. :)
Good post! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Here's a reason... because the prolonged primary is hurting the Dems and helping McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Nah...Nothing can help McCain long term. IMO it's just a talking point for people who
don't want to let everyone vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC