In light of the past two Presidential "Selections" being made by machine and widespread speculation they set the machines to flip votes depending on the pre-election polls.
Would we be better off to be dishonest in the early polls so they wouldn't know the ratio they would need to have to flip votes? Or, do we need those polls to be accurate so if the election is a selection again we could have evidence? Even though that evidence didn't help in our post selection protests after 2004?
| Poll result (3 votes) |
| Dishonest answers to pollsters is the way to go | (3 votes, 100%) | Vote |
| No, we need honest polling so we can have evidence | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |
| No, they don't "Select" Presidents | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |