Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Potential Hillary Clinton Candidacy Worries Some Democratic Lawmakers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:13 PM
Original message
Potential Hillary Clinton Candidacy Worries Some Democratic Lawmakers
By Alexander Bolton
Posted: 03/12/08 07:55 PM


Democratic lawmakers are becoming persuaded that Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) would have a more positive impact on other Democrats on the November ballot than Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). Obama’s advantage over Clinton would be most pronounced in the Southern and Western states President Bush carried in 2000 and 2004, say lawmakers interviewed by The Hill. In total, 32 members of Congress from these “red states” have endorsed Obama. Twenty-two lawmakers from those states have backed Clinton.

Obama will “bring new people into the process in Southern states, there’s no question about it,” said Rep. James Clyburn, the House Democratic whip from South Carolina. “In these Southern states he’s bringing out more people, young people, African-Americans. They’re being energized by him.” Clyburn, who has stayed neutral in the primary, said Obama at the top of the ticket would “certainly” do more to help other Democratic candidates, citing South Carolina and Mississippi specifically.

Bush won both South Carolina and Mississippi by nearly 20 points. A Southern House Democrat who faces a difficult reelection this year said Obama “has the potential to bring more folks to the polls and swell the ranks of Democrats.” The lawmaker, who has not endorsed either candidate, declined to speak on the record because Clinton may become the nominee.

Lawmakers have begun looking more closely at how the nominee may affect their own reelections or influence races in their states. Sensing this, Obama supporters have pushed their colleagues to consider how Obama and Clinton would impact Democratic candidates in November. “I’ve had quiet conversations with a number of members,” said Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), who has endorsed Obama. “I don’t think there’s any doubt about it, Obama would be more helpful to House candidates virtually everywhere. “He has unique appeal to moderates, independents and Republicans,” said Boucher. “And I think he has enormous crossover potential.”


http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/eyeing-obama-coattails-2008-03-12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've said it before. Obama would turn out people to vote for him while Hillary
would turn out people to vote against her. Also, Obama has a wider and broader campaign and raises more money, something the Democratic lawmakers would like to be a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great article! This is exactly what we need if we want to start winning elections and making big
changes. We need NEW Democrats, reinvigorated OLD Democrats and disillusioned people to leave the Republican party to become life-long Democrats. This is happening with Obama and I'm optimistic that, after this silly primary season is over, we will really start to see the effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. He. Can.


Pillary has got to go!


Put a woman on the ticket with him like Barbara Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I vote for Kathleen Sebelius
I don't want to lose any Senators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Excellent point ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. There go your superdelegates, Hillary.
That was her last best shot. If word gets out she has toxic coattails it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. If word gets out? Thought that was a well known fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. GREAT article
THANKS for posting it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Georgie_92 Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great article, thanks for sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Coattails! There's talk of getting 60 Senators - could you imagine that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. 60 Dem Senators?
Be still my heart. I've been trying to curb my C-SPAN 2 habit, but with 60 Dems, I just don't see that happening.

GObama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think the story was in the Times a few days ago; Dem campaign officials were saying it
whether the Dem Senate Campaign Comm or party officials or both, I don't recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. It is very very possible with the right nominee
Tsunami in the Senate
Posted by grantcart in General Discussion
Sun Jan 06th 2008, 01:03 PM
Next year will be the election for the 2nd Class of Senators and it brings forth a perfect storm for Democrats.

Of the 33 Senators up for election 21 are Republicans and 12 are Democrats.
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference...

Of the democrats all but one is in a seat that is considered either very strong or strong and should run with little or no opposition and that is Landrieu in LA.

Of the republicans 9 seats are considered contestable. This does not include wild card seats like Craig ID, or Trent MS in which the republicans will have no incumbent.

4 Seats are vacated by retiring Allard CO, Domenici NM, Hagel NE, Warner VA.

4 Seats are held by republicans in democratic states; Coleman MN, Smith OR, Sununu NH, Collins ME

1 Seat is occupied by a republican currently being investigated by the FBI and could be taken if a good candidate runs
Stevens AL.

The Democratic Senate Campaign has been outraising the republicans by a 10-1 ratio.

It is easier for the Democrats to recruit good candidates because 1) Likely presidential coattails, 2)Higher interest in working in the majority party.

And finally we have the 'Macaca' factor. The rest of the republican candidates will say something stupid and Dean's strategy of having a good candidate in every contest will provide some surprises.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments) | Remove from Journal | Add/Edit intro
Think about where this could go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. pls see #13 below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Looks like the rotten "kitchen sink" strategy is earning some well-deserved scorn.
How anyone can support such a weak, shrill candidate is hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. One possible snag though
I too hope that, if Obama is the nominee, that he'll have long and strong coat tails. But an analysis by the Dallas Morning News gave me some concern. Essentially the analysis said that it appeared that the "Obama" voters didn't bother to vote in the down ticket races. If Obama's the nominee, he's going to have to make a big effort to encourage and inpsire his voters to continue on down the ballot.

The article is here: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/030908dnpoldemvoters.3a5249f.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC