|
This would be a stretch. I don't think this is a likely occurrence. But events have a momentum of their own. It's extraordinarily hard to predict the outcome of any situation, and mroe than often people are caught with egg on their face, especially when they try to say that things will remain stable. That's what happened with Vietnam, and nobody could have predicted that LBJ would step down or the political turmoil that would have erupted.
We are only in April. We face a large uprising in Iraq. Is it so far-fetched to ask that Iraq may be in full-scale revolt by summer? Is it so unbelievable that we could be seeing the US military death rate rise dramatically? Certainly, it's possible that after some fighting, the uprising is put down and Iraq remains volatile but not a VC-type situation. But it is entirely possible that such an event could occur.
Were that to happen, what would be the ramifications? If hundreds upon hundreds of US soldiers are dying, and Dubya's popularity is dropping like a stone in water, is it so inconceivable that the Repubs would dump Bush at the convention? Perhaps replace him with either Giuliani or Frist?
My guess is that this would result in a major Democratic victory. Though perhaps not. If the new Republican nominee repudiates the Bushes and is a forceful candidate, the race could be competitive. But I still think it would Kerry's win. What do you all think?
NOTE: In no way do I want the above situation to happen. It's an odd ambivalence for the Bush-hater. I confess to sometimes feeling self-righteous when hearing bad news in Iraq. It just confirms what I've always thought. But that still doesn't mean that I objectively *want* any of this to happen. The lives of thousands of people are worth more to me than a Kerry victory. I don't want to see him win b/c thousands are dead. I'm just stating what I think would happen if Bush would have to lose the nomination.
|