Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Walter Cronkite calls out Kerry's Liberalism...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:52 PM
Original message
Walter Cronkite calls out Kerry's Liberalism...
An Open Letter To John Kerry

BY WALTER CRONKITE
King Features Syndicate

Dear Sen. Kerry:

In the interests of your campaign and your party's desire to unseat George W. Bush, you have some explaining to do. During the primary campaign, your Democratic opponents accused you of flip-flopping on several important issues, such as your vote in favor of the Iraq War resolution.

Certainly your sensitivity to nuance, your ability to see shades of gray where George Bush sees only black and white, explains some of your difficulty. Shades of gray don't do well in political campaigns, where primary colors are the rule. And your long and distinguished service in the Senate has no doubt led to genuine changes in some positions. But the denial that you are a liberal is almost impossible to reconcile.

snip...

If 1988 taught us anything, it is that a candidate who lacks the courage of his convictions cannot hope to convince the nation that he should be given its leadership. So, Senator, some detailed explanations are in order if you hope to have any chance of defeating even a wounded George II in November. You cannot let the Bush league define you or the issues. You have to do that yourself. Take my advice and lay it all out, before it's too late.

http://www.yankton.net/stories/031804/opE_20040318036.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go Walter! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well that may be some very good advice
Walter is no dummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. he endorses the magic bullet theory
Not the guy I would trust, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yer kiddin
You base your total judgement of him because of his personal theory on the JFK assasination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Also notice
that judgement regarding the magic bullet doesn't address even one of the points Cronkite is making regarding Kerry.

Let me see, if I based my entire view of Cronkite on his position on the magic bullet would that be like basing my entire view of John Kerry on how he voted on the Iraq War Resolution?
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. gd right
Edited on Thu Mar-18-04 01:44 PM by tinanator
I dont trust the corporate media either, particularly with the element of the CIA's involvement, despite historical prohibitions from domestic ops. Shit, I dont trust Kerry, so this all kind of jibes for me. Good luck with your kindler gentler imperialism. When terrorism/retaliatory violence jumps up and bites you and your family in the ass, dont say I didnt warn ya.
-its not a "personal theory" it was a participation in a ridiculously lame computer graphics rebuttal to Oliver North's movie JFK. In that regard the fucker is in the same boat with NPR's number one lobbyist brother havin whore Cokie Roberts. If you dont think the coverup conspiracy of a presidential assassination is important, why in the fuck would you ever even bother voting? Did this nation lose its way that badly as a result, or was it just inevitable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Come on Walter is a good man and a good democrat
if only the rest of the news folks were as decent as he is.

I just sent this letter to the Kerry campaign, here's hoping he listens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. sure thats no major accomplishment though is it?
Compared to what we have had foisted upon us as media over the last twenty years? The facts remain, JFK's assassination and coverup was BIPARTISAN. The fact that there are several camps of intelligence agents doesnt excuse the reality of repeated coups at every level of US and international governance, and that precludes what democracy actually is. I simply prefer to choose my friends more carefully.
Please refer to Carl Bernsteins Rolling Stone article on the CIA in the press. October 20th 1977. Also recall the release of a list of CIA assets in the media which included Cronkite. Who, as tradition requires, denied any such affiliation. Trust us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. This still has nothing to do with
the points Cronkite is making to Kerry regarding the term "liberal."
It's all very interesting, but it's a different subject.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. a historian of ehrlich, is he?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. "You cannot let the *Bush league* define you or the issues"
Nice one Walter. Heh, heh. heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, good for Walter Cronkite
He is right. Follwing please find a definition of "Liberal".

liberal - 1. Not limited to or by traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.

So, tell me, WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH BEING OR BEING CALLED A LIBERAL?

I agree with Walter Cronkite. I believe Kerry needs to define liberalism for the American people and CLAIM the title, proudly.

NOTE: In no way does the definition say that a liberal is weak on defense.

Senator Kerry, if you or any member of your campaign staff are reading this, I would urge you, in addition to claiming your liberalism, to openly state what position Wes Clark would hold in your administration, whether it be VP of Secretary of State. He would then, "have your back", in a more positive way. He is and should be a very valuable workhorse in your stable. Great going, so far, Senator; but, don't let them define you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was wondering
when someone would take the bait and difine Bush League. Thank you Walter. Now who'll Try "Lying King"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Labels are a great way to avoid talking about the issues. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. the demonization of liberals and liberalism *is* an issue.
But by ducking the issue, Dukakis opened the way for the far right to make "L" for liberal a scarlet letter with which to brand all who oppose them. In the course of that 1988 exchange, Bush offered a telling observation, saying, in effect, that liberals don't like being called liberal. You seem to have reaffirmed that analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's why I became disenchanted w/ him in 1988
...after I had spent all primary season working for him, volunteering, even organizing two precincts for him. If he would have stood up and said, "HELL YES, I AM A LIBERAL, YOU GOTTA PROBLEM WITH THAT?", he may very well have won the election-- he was catching Dubya's daddy at the tail end of October.

Everybody likes to whine about "labels" and how candidates are "above" those things. But not ALL labels are BAD!!!

Don't forget what "liberals" have done in the last hundred years: the New Deal, Great Society, Civil Rights, etc.

What's so damned bad about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. to be fair to Mike
I don't know that anyone would have seen what was coming in time to respond well. I keep going back to the question about what he would want to happen to someone who'd raped and murdered his wife, in the context of the death penalty, and wishing he'd said, "Why, I'd want to remove their testicles with a spoon before dipping them, inch by inch, into battery acid - but that's why our system of justice doesn't leave it up to the families of the victims". But he didn't.

Dukakis wasn't a great candidate and got blindsided, but we *do* know how the right wing fights now. My only real problem with MD is that the party took all the wrong lessons from his defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Everyone wants to put Kerry in their own box
I hate when folks do that to me. Kerry should present himself as he sees himself. He shouldn't mold his rhetoric or anything else to any narrow ideology. Not even his own. This is a nation with vast interests and concerns. Our government needs to reflect that. Our president will do well if he resists the pigeonholing that goes with the adoption of these subjective labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Walter Cronkite.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Can't improve on that.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's put everyone in a box and label it
It's the progressive way, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. like it or not,
our political system runs on labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Well, looked who's been hired as spokesperson for the status quo!!
Edited on Thu Mar-18-04 06:22 PM by sangh0
I never thought you'd sign up to run with the big boys, uly! Congratulations.

Maybe I'll take you a lil more seriously from now on. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. well, god knows
that that's what I've wanted all this time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is Cronkite working for Rove now?
Edited on Thu Mar-18-04 09:34 PM by zulchzulu
Time to shuddup and hit the golf course, Wally. That's the way it is.

WTF is Kerry supposed to say?

Hi, I'm John Kerry. And I'm a Liberal. See my t-shirt. It's says I'm a Liberal. Wally Cronkite says I'm a Liberal and I wanna just thank him for pointing that out to me. Gee, even though I feel I did my best with the IWR, maybe I've been flip-flopping. I just wanna admit that. M-kay. Kewl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC