|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 03:59 PM Original message |
Right Wing Rag Milwaukee Journal endorses Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, I like this "right-wing rag's" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Bingo on the underestimation line.. that one is a keeper :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. However Right-Wing it is, it can't be bad as an endorsement from Ann Coulter and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That's right...how quickly we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
48. The Shepherd-Express endorsed him too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. Is the Milwaukee paper a right-wing rag? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. We used to have 2 papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. OH NOES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Yeah, so did I... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. yes. i used to read the Jounal before it merged. cancelled it long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. 81% of corporate media newspaper endorsements go to St. Obama. Reach your own conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Deleted message |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I'll be damned, you're an undeclared Rockies fan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. 13 year fan of the Colorado Rockies.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Yes. Have you ever gone to Pike's Peak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I like skiing. Does that change your life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Who cares? Folks can put anything in a profile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. bullshit_dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I conclude what polls tell us is true. Approx 47% of America will never vote for Hillary EVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. 47%? You mean the numbers Kerry and Gore and Bush wound up by the end? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. No, I am using Hillary's negatives. they range from about 44% to 47% (I used the higher number) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. That is where negatives go after the other party is done with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkshaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Please Jackson, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
45. They know what we know. Hillary is incompetent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. And on the other side of the aisle, they've been heavily for McCain. Imagine that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. I still can't believe Hillary actually CANCELED her Eau Claire Wis townhall ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Yeah, what's so important in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Support the ACLU (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is that supposed to be good news for Obama fans or bad news for Obama fans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I hope it's good news. They don't take bad news very well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
36. Yeah, and hilaryland takes it so well she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Did they spell his name correctly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I don't know. Can't think for yourself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Support the ACLU (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
44. I think for myself quite well, thanks. An endorsement from a right-wing rag is an endorsement (good) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I just posted two facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
20. Well, that Right Wing Rag The New York Times endorsed Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. First you assume I support Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. That may be, but nowhere in this thread is that stated by me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
33. I've never seen The Journal sentinel as a RW rag at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Not sursprizing you do not see it as RW-most of your posts use RW talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Dont POOP on me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. They can't help pooping on people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Of course not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
37. why doesn't all these RW endorsement alarm people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reterr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Oh it does alarm some of us.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. The Houston Chronicle endorsed Obama today too...jays'us h christ! it don't get any redder than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. The Obambots are in denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. In the primaries, most major daily papers endorse one from each major party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reterr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. Yay "post-partisanship" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC