|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:16 AM Original message |
If We Had A Winner-Take-All System In Place, Clinton Would Have Won The Nomination Last Night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. Dean changed the system - to get the nominee faster. Another good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. You forgot Arkansas, which went to Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. good catch....fixed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. Dean didn't change anything- this was inherited from Mcauliffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. We have proportional delegates as the population of states differs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. We have that system because of Jesse Jackson and it helps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
7. How does she get the nomination with 1046 delegates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. because she'd be so far ahead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Um.... wouldnt the states to come ALSO be winner-take-all in your scenario? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. Tough argument you are making. Both campaigns would have had different strategies. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC