|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:45 AM Original message |
Someone please explain how a president alone can garnish wages. Edict? Exec order? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. People keep asking Senator Clinton that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. the question is nonsense and a smear - is a tax a garnishment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neutron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
36. They're trying to cover up the SCANDEL in today's NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. It's a flame baiting question, that's why?? What are you trying to do?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Why is it bullshit to ask how her mandate will be enforced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. What mandate? I don't date men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. In other words, you got nothing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Neither do you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, I tried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. A fine effort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Bone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. How do you pay for Social Security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I'm asking: how can a president garnish wages? Edict? Exec order? How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. Garnishing will not work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. First, you need this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
9. so Clinton says she could garnish wages as a penalty against those who don't buy health insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Quote please, show us where she said this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
29. here you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Isn't that just wonderful? A person can't afford to boost the insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. And if you don't have a job to steal the... hmm, garnish the wages from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. We do need single payer - but until then check out the Mass Universal Plan 's incentives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. How could she do that, as president? Edict? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
10. Just like they do for student loans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
14. By submitting the bill to congress, lobbying it, and signing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. You don't know that, Jesus, nice try but the talking point won't work here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. The President does not submit bills. They need a proxy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Yes, the president does submit bills to congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. True, but a president alone can't mandate such a thing as healthcare garnishments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. You're quibbling. The president will decide, so it matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Who's the fool? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
17. It's the same for all Prez candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunonmars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
18. A better way is the same way the UK does it, a national insurance system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. Paying for the bureaucracy to enforce that is just wasting money that could go toward subsidies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
22. It's a tax..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
23. First of all, until a transcript is available, no one knows what she said...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. TA DA, we have a winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
24. The way I understand it, Clinton's plan would work similar to SS deductions & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
26. This is perhaps the weakest defense I have ever read, ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. It's just plain stupid, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Then please explain it for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheozone (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
39. He/she can't, it would have to be legislation passed by Congress. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. That's what I thought. Hil alone simply cannot mandate garnishing of wages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC