Look at the polls and see: Barack Obama is more electable than Hillary Clinton.

[LoZoccolo]

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm

[sunonmars]

1. snooze, that tired old thing again

[LoZoccolo]

3. You shooze you lose. n/t

[NYCGirl]

4. You Hillites sure loved the polls last year. I wonder what happened? NT

[Evergreen Emerald]

2. Of course. Just like Bush, Obama is the media darling

We Americans are a lazy bunch. It is so much easier to vote for the media darling than to actually know the facts.

Media tells us that Clinton is a racist bitch and Obama IS, and we just accept it and continue to eat our pizza.

[LoZoccolo]

5. We can argue back and forth about why he's ahead.

But it doesn't really matter.

[Evergreen Emerald]

8. unfortunately, you are correct. We will elect a ham sandwich if the media spun it right

It is a shame, but true.

[HonestyIsAVirtue]

6. Your candidate is

responsible for more deaths than I can think of. How's that IWR? I'm furious

[Evergreen Emerald]

10. So is yours Honesty...

He voted to continue the war AGAIN AND AGAIN because it was safe for his political career. He has blood on his hands, just like Clinton.


To blame Clinton and Obama for his war is looking at the issues in a superficial way. As one poster said, "intellectually lazy." Much easier, but wrong.

[GoldieAZ49]

16. no it would be immoral to start a war (H voted for that)

and worse to then not pay for our service men and women to have what they need

Once we went in they HAD to fund it. Unless of course you never want to see another Democrat in office

[Evergreen Emerald]

17. Baloney. Every democrat in that Senate should have

ended this war. And they chose to do what was best for them politically. The bill, once vetoed, should not have been sent back any different. That is how Congress ends wars. Pull the plug.

They did not HAVE to fund it. It would have ended.

[GoldieAZ49]

18. Colin Powell told the President not to go in

"you break it, you have to fix it"

well they broke it.

Not fixing it would have led to the same situation that happened in Afghanistan when we helped run the Soviet Union out and then left without helping them set up a government of their own. That mistake led to the rise of Bin Laden and the Taliban.

Not much of an alternative, is it?

[Zynx]

7. Um......

LA Times/Bloomberg shows Hillary far more electable. The NBC/WSJ poll shows Obama slightly more electable. The Fox News poll is a total push on the subject.

[LoZoccolo]

9. No they don't. n/t

[Zynx]

12. Do you want me to post the damn numbers? That was Romney-esque.

Fox:
Hillary 44 McCain 45(McCain +1)
Obama 44 McCain 43(Obama +1)

NBC/WSJ:
McCain 46 Hillary 44(McCain +2)
Obama 42 Hillary 42(Tie)

LA Times/Bloomberg:
Hillary 46 McCain 42(Hillary +4)
McCain 42 Obama 41(McCain +1)

What the hell is your problem with the truth?

[LoZoccolo]

13. I take that back again; those numbers are old, from the 22nd.

The Fox numbers are newer.

[Zynx]

15. And there is hardly any difference between them.

[LoZoccolo]

11. Oh wait, yes they do.

I guess I'm wrong then.

[Prefer]

14. WIth Barack - there is NO WAY we can lose!

[maddiejoan]

19. Until the Media starts

turning Obama into Hamburger.